Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24799191›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2014

Drosophila blood cell chemotaxis.

Iwan Robert Evans, Will Wood

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring new dimensions of immune cell biology inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemotaxis Assay forFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  18. Ena/VASP proteins regulate activated T-cell trafficking by promoting diapedesis during transendothelial migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iwan Robert EvansDepartment of Infection and Immunity, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK; The Bateson Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Will WoodFaculty of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. Electronic address: w.wood@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 090899Wellcome Trust 090899/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 102503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster contains a population of blood cells called hemocytes that represent the functional equivalent of vertebrate macrophages. These cells undergo directed migrations to disperse during development and reach sites of tissue damage or altered self. These chemotactic behaviors are controlled by the expression of PDGF/Vegf-related ligands in developing embryos and local production of hydrogen peroxide at wounds. Recent work reveals that many molecules important in vertebrate cell motility, including integrins, formins, Ena/VASP proteins and the SCAR/WAVE complex, have a conserved function in these innate immune cells. The use of this model organism has elucidated how damage signals are activated by calcium signaling during inflammation and that the steroid hormone ecdysone activates immune competence at key developmental stages.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularHemocytesHumansProtein BindingDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24799191
PMCPMC4194352
OpenAlexW2052814672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.