ArticleWorld journal of urology2015
Lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Article in World journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Symptom prevalence and quality of life of patients with end-stage liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Palliative medicine · 2019Pooled it
- [Urological aspects in patients with liver cirrhosis].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with liver cirrhosis.
methodsIn total, 128 men with known liver cirrhosis were prospectively evaluated using the validated German version of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire. In parallel, all men underwent a detailed examination including medical history; physical examination; Child-Pugh liver function score (CPS) assessment; and measurement of blood levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), total and free testosterone, sexual hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), prolactin, luteotropic hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH).
resultsMean patient age and mean IPSS was 56 ± 9 years and 8 ± 6, respectively. Mild (IPSS: 1-7), moderate (IPSS: 8-19), and severe (IPSS: 20-35) LUTS were present in 60.2 % (77/128), 31.3 % (40/128), and 7.0 % (9/128) of the patients, respectively. Storage symptoms increased with the CPS (p = 0.04). Voiding symptoms and overall IPSS did not differ between the CPS groups (p = 0.93 and p = 0.67). No correlation was found between ascites volume and IPSS, storage symptoms, voiding symptoms, or quality of life (QoL) (p = 0.46, p = 0.26, p = 0.81, p = 0.87). From CPS groups A to C, mean PSA levels (p = 0.04), total and free testosterone levels (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001), and SHBG levels decreased (p = 0.03); however, prolactin levels increased (p = 0.03). LH and FSH levels did not differ between the CPS groups (p = 0.15 and p = 0.35).
conclusionsMen with liver cirrhosis commonly have LUTS, with a predominance of storage symptoms. Liver cirrhosis may also affect PSA-based prostate cancer risk assessment. Accurate diagnosis and therapy strategies are warranted to improve the QoL of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24798455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.