Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24798445›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Sensitivity and specificity of in situ proximity ligation for protein interaction analysis in a model of steatohepatitis with Mallory-Denk bodies.

Bernhard Zatloukal, Iris Kufferath, Andrea Thueringer, Ulf Landegren, Kurt Zatloukal, Johannes Haybaeck

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Genome Editing and Fatty Liver.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Activation of β1 integrins and caveolin-1 by TF/FVIIa promotes IGF-1R signaling and cell survival.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernhard ZatloukalInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Iris KufferathInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andrea ThueringerInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ulf LandegrenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kurt ZatloukalInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Johannes HaybaeckInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in situ proximity ligation assay (isPLA) is an increasingly used technology for in situ detection of protein interactions, post-translational modifications, and spatial relationships of antigens in cells and tissues, in general. In order to test its performance we compared isPLA with immunofluorescence microscopy by analyzing protein interactions in cytoplasmic protein aggregates, so-called Mallory Denk bodies (MDBs). These structures represent protein inclusions in hepatocytes typically found in human steatohepatitis and they can be generated in mice by feeding of 3,5-diethoxy-carbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC). We investigated the colocalization of all three key MDB components, namely keratin 8 (K8), keratin 18 (K18), and p62 (sequestosome 1) by isPLA and immunofluorescence microscopy. Sensitivity and specificity of isPLA was assessed by using Krt8-/- and Krt18-/- mice as biological controls, along with a series of technical controls. isPLA signal visualization is a robust technology with excellent sensitivity and specificity. The biological relevance of signals generated critically depends on the performance of antibodies used, which requires careful testing of antibodies like in immunofluorescence microscopy. There is a clear advantage of isPLA in visualizing protein co-localization, particularly when antigens are present at markedly different concentrations. Furthermore, isPLA is superior to confocal microscopy with respect to spatial resolution of colocalizing antigens. Disadvantages compared to immunofluorescence are increased costs and longer duration of the laboratory protocol.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesProtein Interaction MappingAnimalsCytoplasmDisease Models, AnimalFatty LiverHepatocytesKeratinsLiverMaleMallory BodiesMiceMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, FluorescenceProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalPyridines3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidineGtf2h1 protein, mouseKeratinsPyridinesTranscription FactorsTranscription Factor TFIIH

Identifiers

PMID24798445
PMCPMC4010503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.