Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24798284›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Biopharmaceutical characterization of nebulized antimicrobial agents in rats: 2. Colistin.

Aline Vidal Lacerda Gontijo, Nicolas Grégoire, Isabelle Lamarche, Patrice Gobin, William Couet, Sandrine Marchand

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biopharmaceutical profiling of anti-infective sanggenons fromInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2024
    Article
  4. No Emergence of Colistin Resistance in the Respiratory Tract of Lung Transplant Patients Treated With Inhaled Colistin.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Optimal control for colistin dosage selection.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aline Vidal Lacerda GontijoInserm U1070, Pôle Biologie Santé, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, UFR Médecine-Pharmacie, Poitiers, France CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília, Brazil.
Nicolas GrégoireInserm U1070, Pôle Biologie Santé, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, UFR Médecine-Pharmacie, Poitiers, France.
Isabelle LamarcheInserm U1070, Pôle Biologie Santé, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, UFR Médecine-Pharmacie, Poitiers, France.
Patrice GobinInserm U1070, Pôle Biologie Santé, Poitiers, France CHU Poitiers, Service de Toxicologie-Pharmacocinétique, Poitiers, France.
William CouetInserm U1070, Pôle Biologie Santé, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, UFR Médecine-Pharmacie, Poitiers, France CHU Poitiers, Service de Toxicologie-Pharmacocinétique, Poitiers, France william.couet@univ-poitiers.fr.
Sandrine MarchandInserm U1070, Pôle Biologie Santé, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, UFR Médecine-Pharmacie, Poitiers, France CHU Poitiers, Service de Toxicologie-Pharmacocinétique, Poitiers, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of colistin following intrapulmonary administration of colistin sulfate in rats. Colistin was infused or delivered in nebulized form at a dose of 0.35 mg/kg of body weight in rats, and plasma drug concentrations were measured for 4 h after administration. Bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) were also conducted at 0.5, 2, and 4 h after intravenous (i.v.) administration and administration via nebulized drug to estimate epithelial lining fluid (ELF) drug concentrations. Unbound colistin plasma concentrations at distribution equilibrium (2 h postdosing) were almost identical after i.v. infusion and nebulized drug inhalation. ELF drug concentrations were undetectable in BAL samples after i.v. administration, but they were about 1,800 times higher than unbound plasma drug levels at 2 h and 4 h after administration of the nebulized drug. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic modeling of plasma and ELF drug concentrations was performed with a model characterized by a fixed physiological volume of ELF (VELF), a passive diffusion clearance (QELF) between plasma and ELF, and a nonlinear influx transfer from ELF to the central compartment, which was assessed by reducing the nebulized dose of colistin by 10-fold (0.035 mg kg(-1)). The km was estimated to be 133 μg ml(-1), and the Vmax, in-to-Km ratio was equal to 2.5 × 10(-3) liter h(-1) kg(-1), which was 37 times higher than the QELF (6.7 × 10(-5) liter h(-1) kg(-1)). This study showed that with the higher ELF drug concentrations after administration via nebulized aerosol than after intravenous administration, for antibiotics with low permeability such as colistin, nebulization offers a real potential over intravenous administration for the treatment of pulmonary infections.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdministration, IntravenousAerosolsAlgorithmsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveBiopharmaceuticsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidColistinMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAerosolsAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistin

Identifiers

PMID24798284
PMCPMC4068596
OpenAlexW4230925475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.