Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24798277›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter safety and efficacy study of rifalazil compared with azithromycin for treatment of uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.

William M Geisler, Maria Luz G Pascual, Judy Mathew, William D Koltun, Franklin Morgan, Byron E Batteiger, Annette Mayes, Sijia Tao, Selwyn J Hurwitz, Chalom Sayada and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01631201 (A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Rifalazil), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01631201 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Rifalazil (25 Milligram) Compared With Azithromycin (1 Gram) for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Genital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection in Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorActivBiotics Pharma, LLCRan2012 to 2013Enrolled82ConditionsChlamydia Trachomatis InfectionArmsRifalazil 25 milligram, Azithromycin 1 gram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Bacterial Transcription as a Target for Antibacterial Drug Development.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

William M GeislerUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Maria Luz G PascualRFS Pharma, Tucker, Georgia, USA.
Judy MathewRFS Pharma, Tucker, Georgia, USA.
William D KoltunMedical Center for Clinical Research, San Diego, California, USA.
Franklin MorganTidewater Physicians for Women, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Byron E BatteigerIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Annette MayesOffice of Annette Mayes, M.D., Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Sijia TaoCenter for AIDS Research, Emory University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Selwyn J HurwitzCenter for AIDS Research, Emory University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Chalom SayadaActivBiotics Pharma, Tucker, Georgia, USA.
Raymond F SchinaziCenter for AIDS Research, Emory University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA rschina@emory.edu.

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
NIAID NIH HHS 5P30-AI-50409NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind study comparing single-dose chlamydia therapies of oral rifalazil (25 mg) and azithromycin (1 g) was conducted in 82 women with uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. The microbiologic cure rate of C. trachomatis with rifalazil (n = 33) was 84.8% at the visit on day 22 to 26 (test-of-cure visit), versus 92.1% with azithromycin (n = 38), and the number of treatment failures in each group was 5 and 3, respectively. The difference in cure rate was -7.3%, with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of -22.5, and thus, noninferiority was not established at the prespecified margin (lower limit of CI of -15%). The overall treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and treatment-related TEAE rates were lower in the rifalazil group (68% and 55%) than in the azithromycin group (71% and 62%), respectively. Subjects classified as treatment failures at day 22 to 26 had a lower mean plasma concentration of rifalazil at the visit on day 8 to 12 than those classified as treatment cures, but this difference was not significant; however, the levels were similar for both groups at the visit on day 22 to 26. A single 25-mg dose of rifalazil was well tolerated and eradicated C. trachomatis in most of these women with uncomplicated genital C. trachomatis infection. (The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under registration no. NCT01631201).

Indexed as

Chlamydia trachomatisAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChlamydia InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodEndpoint DeterminationFemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleHumansRifamycinsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinKRM 1648Rifamycins

Identifiers

PMID24798277
PMCPMC4068607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.