Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24798267›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Impact of different antimicrobial therapies on clinical and fiscal outcomes of patients with bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Kayoko Hayakawa, Emily T Martin, Uma Mahesh Gudur, Dror Marchaim, Dalia Dalle, Khaled Alshabani, Kalyan Srinivas Muppavarapu, Fnu Jaydev, Pradeep Bathina, Pranathi Rao Sundaragiri and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ManagingEClinicalMedicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of linezolid combination therapy for serious infections: review of the current evidence.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kayoko HayakawaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan kayokohayakawa@gmail.com.
Emily T MartinDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Uma Mahesh GudurDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Dror MarchaimDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Dalia DalleDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Khaled AlshabaniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Kalyan Srinivas MuppavarapuDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Fnu JaydevDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Pradeep BathinaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Pranathi Rao SundaragiriDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Shashi Dhar RajuriDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Jaikumar KhatriDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Jason M PogueDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Paul R LephartDetroit Medical Center University Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Michael J RybakDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Keith S KayeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Wayne State University · USDetroit Medical Center · USDMC University Laboratories · USEugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · US

Funding

Defining Precursors to VRSA Emergence: Epidemiology of MRSA & VRE Dual InfectionK01AI099006 · NIAID · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, EMILY TOTH · 2012 to 2016
$641k
NIAID NIH HHS 5K01AI099006-02NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI099006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a growing health problem, and uncertainties exist regarding the optimal therapy for bloodstream infection due to VRE. We conducted systematic comparative evaluations of the impact of different antimicrobial therapies on the outcomes of patients with bloodstream infections due to VRE. A retrospective study from January 2008 to October 2010 was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. Unique patients with blood cultures due to VRE were included and reviewed. Three major therapeutic classes were analyzed: daptomycin, linezolid, and β-lactams. Three multivariate models were conducted for each outcome, matching for a propensity score predicting the likelihood of receipt of one of the therapeutic classes. A total of 225 cases of bacteremia due to VRE were included, including 86 (38.2%) cases of VR Enterococcus faecalis and 139 (61.8%) of VR Enterococcus faecium. Bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was more frequent among subjects treated with β-lactams than among those treated with daptomycin or linezolid. The median dose of daptomycin was 6 mg/kg of body weight (range, 6 to 12 mg/kg). After controlling for propensity score and bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis, differences in mortality were nonsignificant among the treatment groups. Therapy with daptomycin was associated with higher median variable direct cost per day than that for linezolid. This large study revealed the three therapeutic classes (daptomycin, linezolid, and β-lactams) are similarly efficacious in the treatment of bacteremia due to susceptible strains of VRE.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiabeta-LactamsCohort StudiesDaptomycinFemaleGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHospital CostsHumansLinezolidMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsDaptomycinLinezolid

Identifiers

PMID24798267
PMCPMC4068570
OpenAlexW2115261716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.