Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24798240›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2014

Preventive care for low-income women in massachusetts post-health reform.

Cheryl R Clark, Jane Soukup, Heather Riden, Dora Tovar, Piper Orton, Elisabeth Burdick, Mary Ellen Capistran, Jennifer Morisset, Elizabeth E Browne, Garrett Fitzmaurice and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. U.S. Women's Intended Sources for Reproductive Health Care.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Women living with HIV and healthcare reform.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014
    Article
  10. The ACA and Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl R Clark1 Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Jane Soukup
Heather Riden
Dora Tovar
Piper Orton
Elisabeth Burdick
Mary Ellen Capistran
Jennifer Morisset
Elizabeth E Browne
Garrett Fitzmaurice
Paula A Johnson
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USChelsea Hospital · US

Funding

MASSACHUSETTS CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAMU58DP000821 · DP · MASSACHUSETTS STATE DEPT OF PUB HEALTH · PI NYAMBOSE, JOSHUA · 2007 to 2011
$22.1M
Geographic Variation in Cardiovascular Inflammation in Middle-aged & Elderly PopuK08AG032357 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CLARK, CHERYL RENEE · 2009 to 2013
$634k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58DP000821NIA NIH HHS K08 AG032357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBefore enacting health insurance reform in 2006, Massachusetts provided free breast, cervical cancer, and cardiovascular risk screening for low-income uninsured women through a federally subsidized program called the Women's Health Network (WHN). This article examines whether, as women transitioned to insurance to pay for screening tests after health reform legislation was passed, cancer and cardiovascular disease screening changed among WHN participants between 2004 and 2010.

methodsWe examined claims data from the Massachusetts health insurance exchange and chart review data to measure utilization of mammography, Pap smear, and blood pressure screening among WHN participants in five community health centers in greater Boston. We conducted a longitudinal analysis, by insurance type, using generalized estimating equations to examine the likelihood of screening at recommended intervals in the postreform period compared to the prereform period.

resultsPre- and postreform, we found a high prevalence of recommended mammography (86% vs. 88%), Pap smear (88% vs. 89%), and blood pressure screening (87% vs. 91%) that was similar or improved for most women postreform. Screening use differed by insurance type. Recommended mammography screening was statistically significantly increased among women with state-subsidized private insurance (odds ratio [OR] 1.58, p<0.05). Women with unsubsidized private insurance or Medicare had decreased Pap smear use postreform. Although screening prevalence was high, 31% of women required state safety-net funds to pay for screening tests.

conclusionOur results suggest a continued need for safety-net programs to support preventive screening among low-income women after implementation of healthcare reform.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformAdultBlood Pressure DeterminationBostonBreast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthLongitudinal StudiesMammographyMassachusettsMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePoverty

Identifiers

PMID24798240
PMCPMC4046344
OpenAlexW1482786495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.