Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24797910›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Evidence for transmission of bluetongue virus serotype 26 through direct contact.

Carrie Batten, Karin Darpel, Mark Henstock, Petra Fay, Eva Veronesi, Simon Gubbins, Samantha Graves, Lorraine Frost, Christopher Oura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Modelling bluetongue risk in Kazakhstan.Parasites & vectors · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carrie BattenNon Vesicular Reference Laboratory, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Karin DarpelVaccinology, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom; School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Mark HenstockNon Vesicular Reference Laboratory, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Petra FayNon Vesicular Reference Laboratory, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Eva VeronesiEntomology, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Simon GubbinsCentre for Integrative Biology, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Samantha GravesNon Vesicular Reference Laboratory, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Lorraine FrostNon Vesicular Reference Laboratory, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Christopher OuraNon Vesicular Reference Laboratory, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, United Kingdom; School of Veterinary Medicine, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
The Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00001159Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00001709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the mechanisms of transmission of bluetongue virus serotype 26 (BTV-26) in goats. A previous study, which investigated the pathogenicity and infection kinetics of BTV-26 in goats, unexpectedly revealed that one control goat may have been infected through a direct contact transmission route. To investigate the transmission mechanisms of BTV-26 in more detail an experimental infection study was carried out in which three goats were infected with BTV-26, three goats were kept uninfected, but were housed in direct contact with the infected goats, and an additional four goats were kept in indirect contact separated from infected goats by metal gates. This barrier allowed the goats to have occasional face-to-face contact in the same airspace, but feeding, watering, sampling and environmental cleaning was carried out separately. The three experimentally infected goats did not show clinical signs of BTV, however high levels of viral RNA were detected and virus was isolated from their blood. At 21 dpi viral RNA was detected in, and virus was isolated from the blood of the three direct contact goats, which also seroconverted. The four indirect barrier contact goats remained uninfected throughout the duration of the experiment. In order to assess replication in a laboratory model species of Culicoides biting midge, more than 300 Culicoides sonorensis were fed a BTV-26 spiked blood meal and incubated for 7 days. The dissemination of BTV-26 in individual C. sonorensis was inferred from the quantity of virus RNA and indicated that none of the insects processed at day 7 possessed transmissible infections. This study shows that BTV-26 is easily transmitted through direct contact transmission between goats, and the strain does not seem to replicate in C. sonorensis midges using standard incubation conditions.

Indexed as

Bluetongue virusModels, BiologicalSerogroupAnimalsBluetongueCeratopogonidaeGoatsInsect VectorsRNA, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID24797910
PMCPMC4010411
OpenAlexW2053287898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.