ReviewPaediatric drugs2014
Improving outcomes in children with sickle cell disease: treatment considerations and strategies.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bright IDEAS problem-solving skills training for caregivers of children with sickle cell disease: A two-site pilot feasibility trial.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2021Trial
- Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes among Medicaid and Privately Insured Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2021Article
- Opioid Use in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease Hospitalized During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis: A Systematic Review.Journal of hematology · 2021Article
- The gut microbiome in sickle cell disease: Characterization and potential implications.PloS one · 2021Article
- Factors Influencing Motivation and Engagement in Mobile Health Among Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in Low-Prevalence, High-Income Countries: Qualitative Exploration of Patient Requirements.JMIR human factors · 2020Article
- Gender-Related Differences in Sickle Cell Disease in a Pediatric Cohort: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
- Novel insights in the management of sickle cell disease in childhood.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decades there has been a significant improvement in the care of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) in high-income countries. However, more needs to be learned about the complex pathophysiology and the factors that contribute to the development of end organ damage from the disease. While antibiotic prophylaxis and appropriate treatment of infections have resulted in a significant reduction of early mortality, management of the painful episodes and prevention of organ damage remain a challenge. Hydroxyurea is the only medication approved as disease-modifying therapy, and bone marrow transplant as curative treatment is not available to most patients. In low-income countries with the highest disease burden, early mortality is high due to limited resources for systematic screening, early diagnosis, and disease management. In order to improve outcomes in patients with SCD in high-income countries, better and widespread implementation of known disease-modifying therapies and the development of newer therapies targeting key pathophysiologic pathways are required. In low-income countries with high disease burden, innovative approaches to develop low-cost diagnostic devices and treatments that can be implemented to scale are needed to combat early mortality from the disease. Sustainable solutions in low-resource settings require evidence-based affordable interventions that can be integrated into primary and secondary healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24797542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.