Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24797542›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2014

Improving outcomes in children with sickle cell disease: treatment considerations and strategies.

Ali Amid, Isaac Odame

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali AmidDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Isaac Odame

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decades there has been a significant improvement in the care of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) in high-income countries. However, more needs to be learned about the complex pathophysiology and the factors that contribute to the development of end organ damage from the disease. While antibiotic prophylaxis and appropriate treatment of infections have resulted in a significant reduction of early mortality, management of the painful episodes and prevention of organ damage remain a challenge. Hydroxyurea is the only medication approved as disease-modifying therapy, and bone marrow transplant as curative treatment is not available to most patients. In low-income countries with the highest disease burden, early mortality is high due to limited resources for systematic screening, early diagnosis, and disease management. In order to improve outcomes in patients with SCD in high-income countries, better and widespread implementation of known disease-modifying therapies and the development of newer therapies targeting key pathophysiologic pathways are required. In low-income countries with high disease burden, innovative approaches to develop low-cost diagnostic devices and treatments that can be implemented to scale are needed to combat early mortality from the disease. Sustainable solutions in low-resource settings require evidence-based affordable interventions that can be integrated into primary and secondary healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Acute Chest SyndromeAnemia, Sickle CellAntibiotic ProphylaxisChildCosts and Cost AnalysisHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansHydroxyureaPain ManagementHydroxyurea

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.