Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2014
The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a single-center experience over 5 years.
Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Detection of Thyroid Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- The Landmark Series: Testing in Thyroid Nodule Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Cost effectiveness of intraoperative pathology in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Article
- Preoperative Diagnostic Categories of Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features in Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy and Its Impact on Risk of Malignancy.Endocrine pathology · 2019Article
- Thyroid nodules with Hürthle cells: the malignancy risk in relation to the FNA outcome category.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2019Article
- Assessment of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.American journal of clinical pathology · 2019Article
- Does the ACR TI-RADS scoring allow us to safely avoid unnecessary thyroid biopsy? single center analysis in a large cohort.Endocrine · 2018Article
- Classification of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology into Bethesda categories: An institutional experience and review of the literature.CytoJournal · 2018Article
- The evaluation of miRNAs on thyroid FNAC: the promising role of miR-375 in follicular neoplasms.Endocrine · 2016Article
- Article
- Stromal tissue as an adjunct tool in the diagnosis of follicular thyroid lesions by fine-needle aspiration biopsy.CytoJournal · 2016Article
- Fine needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: cytologic and histopathologic correlation of 1096 patients.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015Article
- The diagnosis value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for thyroid malignancy without highly suspicious features on conventional ultrasound.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: an institutional perspective.International archives of medicine · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) was developed to refine fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology definitions and improve clinical management. This study evaluates the impact of the BSRTC 5 years after its adoption at a single institution.
methodsA total of 1,625 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in the pre-BSRTC (Group 1: July 2007-January 2009) and post-BSRTC (Group 2: February 2009-September 2013) periods were reviewed. Cytologic diagnoses in Group 1 included non-diagnostic, benign, follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy and malignant. Atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) was included in Group 2. The proportions of each FNA category and malignancy rate per cytologic diagnosis were compared.
resultsFifty-four percent (187/347) of Group 1 patients had a preoperative FNA versus 61 % (777/1278) in Group 2 (p = 0.02). Group 1 FNA results included 3 % non-diagnostic, 48 % benign, 17 % follicular, 13 % suspicious for cancer, and 19 % cancer. Group 2 results included 3 % non-diagnostic, 36 % benign, 9 % follicular, 8 % suspicious for malignancy, 18 % malignant and 26 % AUS/FLUS. In Group 2, the proportions of benign, follicular and suspicious for malignancy FNAs decreased significantly (p < 0.05). In Group 2, there were more indeterminate FNA diagnoses overall (30 vs. 43 %; p < 0.001). The rate of cancer in suspicious for cancer FNA lesions increased from 44 to 65 % (p = 0.07). The AUS/FLUS malignancy rate was 15 %.
conclusionsSince the adoption of the BSRTC at our institution, the proportion of indeterminate FNAs has increased; however, the diagnostic accuracy of the suspicious for cancer category improved. We recommend periodic review of the utilization and malignancy rates per cytologic category at each institution to help tailor clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.