Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24796290›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2014

Characterization of prostate neuroendocrine cancers and therapeutic management: a literature review.

P Sargos, L Ferretti, M Gross-Goupil, M Orre, F Cornelis, B Henriques de Figueiredo, N Houédé, C Merino, G Roubaud, B Dallaudiére and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Targeting Key Players of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

P SargosPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
L FerrettiPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
M Gross-GoupilPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
M OrrePrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
F CornelisPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
B Henriques de FigueiredoPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
N HouédéPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
C MerinoPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
G RoubaudPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
B DallaudiérePrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
P RichaudPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.
A FléchonPrimary Work, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNeuroendocrine prostate cancers (NEPCs) are rare. The current lack of consensus for clinical, biological and pathological characterization as well as therapeutic approach makes the management of those tumors a clinical challenge. This literature review aims to summarize available data on the characterization and management of patients with prostate cancer with a neuroendocrine element. We try to identify major controversies and uncertainties in order to understand all aspects of this particular entity.

methodsWe searched for all articles published and registered in the MEDLINE database before 31 November 2013 with the following search terms: (('prostatic neoplasms' (MeSH Terms)) AND ('carcinoma, neuroendocrine' (MeSH Terms)) OR ('carcinoma, small cell' (MeSH Terms))) AND (English (Language)).

resultsCase reports, letters or comments were excluded. We then selected relevant articles from titles and abstracts. Overall, 278 articles published between 1976 and November 2013 were identified. No definition of NEPC seems to be clearly established. Natural history of the disease reveals poor prognosis with median survival of up to 10 to 13 months. Histological characterization appears difficult. Serum markers could be helpful with some controversies in terms of prognostic significance. Concerning management, the majority of patients received local treatment combined with chemotherapy in case of early and localized disease. Few clinical trials described strategy for metastatic disease.

conclusionsThe exploration of the different pathways implicated in the neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancers is essential for the comprehension of castration-resistance mechanisms. It will enable the identification of optimal therapeutic strategies for which no recommendation is currently established. Inclusion in prospective clinical trials appears necessary to identify the adequate strategy.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDisease ManagementHumansMaleNeuroendocrine TumorsPatient Outcome AssessmentPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24796290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.