Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24795850›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2014

Microbial communities respond to experimental warming, but site matters.

Melissa A Cregger, Nathan J Sanders, Robert R Dunn, Aimée T Classen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa A CreggerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN , USA.
Nathan J SandersDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN , USA ; The Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Robert R DunnDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, NC , USA.
Aimée T ClassenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN , USA ; The Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because microorganisms are sensitive to temperature, ongoing global warming is predicted to influence microbial community structure and function. We used large-scale warming experiments established at two sites near the northern and southern boundaries of US eastern deciduous forests to explore how microbial communities and their function respond to warming at sites with differing climatic regimes. Soil microbial community structure and function responded to warming at the southern but not the northern site. However, changes in microbial community structure and function at the southern site did not result in changes in cellulose decomposition rates. While most global change models rest on the assumption that taxa will respond similarly to warming across sites and their ranges, these results suggest that the responses of microorganisms to warming may be mediated by differences across the geographic boundaries of ecosystems.

Indexed as

DecompositionEastern deciduous forestsEcosystem functionGlobal warmingMicrobial communitiesSoil enzyme activity

Identifiers

PMID24795850
PMCPMC4006228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.