ArticleJournal of clinical research & bioethics2014
Multi-Media Educational Tool Increases Knowledge of Clinical Trials in Uganda.
Article in Journal of clinical research & bioethics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability and effectiveness of a study information video in improving the research consent process for youth: a non-inferiority trial.BMJ global health · 2025Trial
- Randomized comparison of two interventions to enhance understanding during the informed consent process for research.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2021Trial
- A multimedia consent tool for research participants in the Gambia: a randomized controlled trial.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2015Trial
- Peer perspectives on assisted partner notification for HIV and syphilis testing among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Uganda: a qualitative study.Discover public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Challenges arising when seeking broad consent for health research data sharing: a qualitative study of perspectives in Thailand.BMC medical ethics · 2018Article
- Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2018Article
- Impact of an educational video as a consent tool on knowledge about cure research among patients and caregivers at HIV clinics in South Africa.Journal of virus eradication · 2018Article
- Recall and decay of consent information among parents of infants participating in a randomized controlled clinical trial using an audio-visual tool in The Gambia.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Article
- Text messaging to decrease tuberculosis treatment attrition in TB-HIV coinfection in Uganda.Patient preference and adherence · 2017Article
- The Effect of New Model PREPARED on Obtaining Informed Consent Skill in Midwifery Students of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInformed consent is premised on the participants' understanding the scope of the research and the associated risks and benefits. The objective was to evaluate the improvement in knowledge in a population unfamiliar with clinical trial concepts about "what it means to be part of a clinical trial" using an innovative educational tool called the 'Speaking Book'.
methodsThis was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a research site in Uganda. 201 participants were randomized to: 1) clinical trials information session control arm, or 2) clinical trials information session followed by instruction in the use of the Speaking Book with a take-home copy (intervention arm). After the session, participants of both groups completed a 22-item multiple-choice test on the rights and responsibilities of participants. Participants returned after one week to complete the same test to assess knowledge retention. The mean pre- and post-test score difference was assessed according to trial arm using an unpaired t-test of proportions.
resultsNinety-one (90%) participants completed both the initial and follow-up tests in the control arm and 100 (100%) in the intervention arm. The average age of participants was 38 years, 53% were female and 67% were employed; 20% had previously been invited to participate in a clinical trial; of these, 19% had participated. The mean difference in proportion of correct responses from test 1 to test 2 was 2.7% (95%CI 0.3%-5.0%) for the control arm and 11.6% (95%CI 9.3%-13.7%) for the intervention arm (t-score= -5.3, p-value<0.0001).
conclusionParticipants who had instruction in the use of the Speaking Book had a larger increase in knowledge than those who had no access to this tool. To better engage patients unfamiliar with clinical trial concepts, innovative educational techniques can assist to increase knowledge to make an informed decision about participation in a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.