Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24795718›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2014

T cell responses to viral infections - opportunities for Peptide vaccination.

Sietske Rosendahl Huber, Josine van Beek, Jørgen de Jonge, Willem Luytjes, Debbie van Baarle

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04790240 (The Trial Uses Medicinal Herbs to Direct T Cells to Engulf the COVID-19 Virus and Protect the Organs Well), which is not on this map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04790240 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Trial Uses Medicinal Herbs to Direct T Cells to Engulf the COVID-19 Virus and Protect the Organs Well

TypeinterventionalSponsorAll Natural Medicine Clinic, LLCRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsCovid19 Virus InfectionArmsInflammation (I), Inflammation (II), Inflammation (III), Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sietske Rosendahl HuberCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven , Netherlands.
Josine van BeekCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven , Netherlands.
Jørgen de JongeCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven , Netherlands.
Willem LuytjesCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven , Netherlands.
Debbie van BaarleCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) , Bilthoven , Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An effective immune response against viral infections depends on the activation of cytotoxic T cells that can clear infection by killing virus-infected cells. Proper activation of these T cells depends on professional antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells (DCs). In this review, we will discuss the potential of peptide-based vaccines for prevention and treatment of viral diseases. We will describe features of an effective response against both acute and chronic infections, such as an appropriate magnitude, breadth, and quality and discuss requirements for inducing such an effective antiviral immune response. We will address modifications that affect presentation of vaccine components by DCs, including choice of antigen, adjuvants, and formulation. Furthermore, we will describe differences in design between preventive and therapeutic peptide-based vaccines. The ultimate goal in the design of preventive vaccines is to develop a universal vaccine that cross-protects against multiple strains of the virus. For therapeutic vaccines, cross-protection is of less importance, but enhancing existing T cell responses is essential. Although peptide vaccination is successful in inducing responses in human papillomavirus (HPV) infected patients, there are still several challenges such as choosing the right target epitopes, choosing safe adjuvants that improve immunogenicity of these epitopes, and steering the immune response in the desired direction. We will conclude with an overview of the current status of peptide vaccination, hurdles to overcome, and prospects for the future.

Indexed as

acutechronicDCinfectionpeptidesvaccinationvirus

Identifiers

PMID24795718
PMCPMC3997009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.