Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24795619›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2014

High-throughput neuroimaging-genetics computational infrastructure.

Ivo D Dinov, Petros Petrosyan, Zhizhong Liu, Paul Eggert, Sam Hobel, Paul Vespa, Seok Woo Moon, John D Van Horn, Joseph Franco, Arthur W Toga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of genomic data via statistical distribution.Journal of theoretical biology · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ivo D DinovLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Biomedical Informatics Research Network, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Statistics Online Computational Resource, University of Michigan, UMSN Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Petros PetrosyanLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Zhizhong LiuLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Paul EggertLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sam HobelLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Paul VespaBrain Injury Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Seok Woo MoonDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Konkuk University School of Medicine Seoul, Korea.
John D Van HornLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joseph FrancoLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Arthur W TogaLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Biomedical Informatics Research Network, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI MICHAEL W WEINER · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
UCLA ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG016570 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BREDESEN, DALE E. · 1999 to 2014
$25.9M
FUNCTION BIRNU24RR021992 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI POTKIN, STEVEN G · 2006 to 2010
$25.0M
BIO-INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORK COORDINATING CENTER (BIRN-CC)U24RR025736 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KESSELMAN, CARL · 2009 to 2011
$15.0M
TR&D3: Intrinsic Surface MappingP41EB015922 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VAN HORN, JOHN DARRELL · 2012 to 2022
$14.1M
Bio-Informatics Research Network Coordinating Center (BIRN-CC)U24GM104203 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KESSELMAN, CARL · 2012 to 2013
$8.3M
Collaborative Brain Mapping: Tools for SharingR01MH071940 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2004 to 2008
$3.2M
DIGITAL REPRESENTATION AND VISUALIZATION OF HUMAN BRAINR01LM005639 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 1995 to 2005
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR021992NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR025736NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016570NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015922NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM104203NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071940NLM NIH HHS R01 LM005639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many contemporary neuroscientific investigations face significant challenges in terms of data management, computational processing, data mining, and results interpretation. These four pillars define the core infrastructure necessary to plan, organize, orchestrate, validate, and disseminate novel scientific methods, computational resources, and translational healthcare findings. Data management includes protocols for data acquisition, archival, query, transfer, retrieval, and aggregation. Computational processing involves the necessary software, hardware, and networking infrastructure required to handle large amounts of heterogeneous neuroimaging, genetics, clinical, and phenotypic data and meta-data. Data mining refers to the process of automatically extracting data features, characteristics and associations, which are not readily visible by human exploration of the raw dataset. Result interpretation includes scientific visualization, community validation of findings and reproducible findings. In this manuscript we describe the novel high-throughput neuroimaging-genetics computational infrastructure available at the Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics (INI) and the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging (LONI) at University of Southern California (USC). INI and LONI include ultra-high-field and standard-field MRI brain scanners along with an imaging-genetics database for storing the complete provenance of the raw and derived data and meta-data. In addition, the institute provides a large number of software tools for image and shape analysis, mathematical modeling, genomic sequence processing, and scientific visualization. A unique feature of this architecture is the Pipeline environment, which integrates the data management, processing, transfer, and visualization. Through its client-server architecture, the Pipeline environment provides a graphical user interface for designing, executing, monitoring validating, and disseminating of complex protocols that utilize diverse suites of software tools and web-services. These pipeline workflows are represented as portable XML objects which transfer the execution instructions and user specifications from the client user machine to remote pipeline servers for distributed computing. Using Alzheimer's and Parkinson's data, we provide several examples of translational applications using this infrastructure.

Indexed as

agingAlzheimer's diseasebig datacomputation solutionsgeneticsneuroimagingpipelinevisualization

Identifiers

PMID24795619
PMCPMC4005931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.