ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2014
High-throughput neuroimaging-genetics computational infrastructure.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging of headache: Issues, best-practices, and new directions, a narrative review.Headache · 2023Review
- Classifying migraine using PET compressive big data analytics of brain'sFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Data management strategy for a collaborative research center.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Bridging the Brain and Data Sciences.Big data · 2021Article
- Compressive Big Data Analytics: An ensemble meta-algorithm for high-dimensional multisource datasets.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Controlled feature selection and compressive big data analytics: Applications to biomedical and health studies.PloS one · 2018Article
- Comparison of genomic data via statistical distribution.Journal of theoretical biology · 2016Article
- Methodological challenges and analytic opportunities for modeling and interpreting Big Healthcare Data.GigaScience · 2016Review
- The Image and Data Archive at the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging.NeuroImage · 2016Article
- Article
- T2-Imaging Changes in the Nigrosome-1 Relate to Clinical Measures of Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2016Article
- Going beyond the current neuroinformatics infrastructure.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2015Article
- Mild traumatic brain injury and delayed alteration of memory processing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Article
- SOCR data dashboard: an integrated big data archive mashing medicare, labor, census and econometric information.Journal of big dataArticle
- Wrangling Big Data Through Diversity, Research Education and Partnerships.Californian journal of health promotionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many contemporary neuroscientific investigations face significant challenges in terms of data management, computational processing, data mining, and results interpretation. These four pillars define the core infrastructure necessary to plan, organize, orchestrate, validate, and disseminate novel scientific methods, computational resources, and translational healthcare findings. Data management includes protocols for data acquisition, archival, query, transfer, retrieval, and aggregation. Computational processing involves the necessary software, hardware, and networking infrastructure required to handle large amounts of heterogeneous neuroimaging, genetics, clinical, and phenotypic data and meta-data. Data mining refers to the process of automatically extracting data features, characteristics and associations, which are not readily visible by human exploration of the raw dataset. Result interpretation includes scientific visualization, community validation of findings and reproducible findings. In this manuscript we describe the novel high-throughput neuroimaging-genetics computational infrastructure available at the Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics (INI) and the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging (LONI) at University of Southern California (USC). INI and LONI include ultra-high-field and standard-field MRI brain scanners along with an imaging-genetics database for storing the complete provenance of the raw and derived data and meta-data. In addition, the institute provides a large number of software tools for image and shape analysis, mathematical modeling, genomic sequence processing, and scientific visualization. A unique feature of this architecture is the Pipeline environment, which integrates the data management, processing, transfer, and visualization. Through its client-server architecture, the Pipeline environment provides a graphical user interface for designing, executing, monitoring validating, and disseminating of complex protocols that utilize diverse suites of software tools and web-services. These pipeline workflows are represented as portable XML objects which transfer the execution instructions and user specifications from the client user machine to remote pipeline servers for distributed computing. Using Alzheimer's and Parkinson's data, we provide several examples of translational applications using this infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.