ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2014
Hox gene regulation in the central nervous system of Drosophila.
Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- scRNA-seq data from the larval Drosophila ventral cord provides a resource for studying motor systems function and development.Developmental cell · 2024Article
- A Compilation of the Diverse miRNA Functions inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Regulation of FSH Synthesis by Differentially Expressed miR-488 in Anterior Adenohypophyseal Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- A multitude of signaling pathways associated with Alzheimer's disease and their roles in AD pathogenesis and therapy.Medicinal research reviews · 2021Review
- LINC00152 acts as a potential marker in gliomas and promotes tumor proliferation and invasion through the LINC00152/miR-107/RAB10 axis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Olfactory receptor-dependent receptor repression inScience advances · 2021Article
- Homeotic Genes: Clustering, Modularity, and Diversity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Emerging Roles for Hox Proteins in the Last Steps of Neuronal Development in Worms, Flies, and Mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- The physiological function of long-noncoding RNAs.Non-coding RNA research · 2020Review
- MEIS2C and MEIS2D promote tumor progression via Wnt/β-catenin and hippo/YAP signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019Article
- Mechanisms of Long Non-Coding RNAs in the Assembly and Plasticity of Neural Circuitry.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017Review
- MicroRNA-encoded behavior in Drosophila.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2015Article
- Hox miRNA regulation within the Drosophila Bithorax complex: Patterning behavior.Mechanisms of development · 2015Review
- Editorial for "Regulatory RNAs in the nervous system".Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Article
- Role of abd-A and Abd-B in development of abdominal epithelia breaks posterior prevalence rule.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hox genes specify the structures that form along the anteroposterior (AP) axis of bilateria. Within the genome, they often form clusters where, remarkably enough, their position within the clusters reflects the relative positions of the structures they specify along the AP axis. This correspondence between genomic organization and gene expression pattern has been conserved through evolution and provides a unique opportunity to study how chromosomal context affects gene regulation. In Drosophila, a general rule, often called "posterior dominance," states that Hox genes specifying more posterior structures repress the expression of more anterior Hox genes. This rule explains the apparent spatial complementarity of Hox gene expression patterns in Drosophila. Here we review a noticeable exception to this rule where the more-posteriorly expressed Abd-B Hox gene fails to repress the more-anterior abd-A gene in cells of the central nervous system (CNS). While Abd-B is required to repress ectopic expression of abd-A in the posterior epidermis, abd-A repression in the posterior CNS is accomplished by a different mechanism that involves a large 92 kb long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) encoded by the intergenic region separating abd-A and Abd-B (the iab8ncRNA). Dissection of this lncRNA revealed that abd-A is repressed by the lncRNA using two redundant mechanisms. The first mechanism is mediated by a microRNA (mir-iab-8) encoded by intronic sequence within the large iab8-ncRNA. Meanwhile, the second mechanism seems to involve transcriptional interference by the long iab-8 ncRNA on the abd-A promoter. Recent work demonstrating CNS-specific regulation of genes by ncRNAs in Drosophila, seem to highlight a potential role for the iab-8-ncRNA in the evolution of the Drosophila Hox complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.