Lessons learned from studies of natural resistance in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a commonly-used animal model of the human demyelinating disease, multiple sclerosis (MS). Similar to MS, EAE is under genetic control in that certain mouse strains are susceptible to disease induction with myelin antigens, while other strains are resistant. In the past, major efforts studying EAE tended to focus on the mechanism of disease susceptibility pertaining to antigen specificities, disease progression and related cytokines. The basis of EAE resistance, on the other hand, had received relatively little attention. It is our contention that EAE resistance is a tightly regulated process and many lessons can be learned from studying its mechanisms. Initially, this laboratory showed that resistance to EAE induced by MBP in B6 mice and many other strains with different H-2 haplotypes could be reversed in an adoptive transfer system by challenging the recipients with MBP-CFA. The disease developed in these mice was very similar to that induced in EAE susceptible mouse strains without the antigenic challenge. This approach of reversing EAE resistance was confirmed by several other laboratories. It was also demonstrated definitively that EAE was mediated by the donor T cells and not by host T cells. Indeed, a "resistant" host environment did not affect the outcome of disease development. The antigenic challenge appeared to induce an anamnestic response in the donor T cells, as the antigen dose used could be as low as only 5µg per mouse. Significantly, the period between adoptive cell transfer and antigenic challenge could be as long as over one year, again indicating that the donor cells persisted in the host for a long period of time. Recently, it has been suggested that EAE resistance can be due to the activities of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Depletion of Tregs with anti-CD25 antibodies prior to immunization with PLP139-151 rendered 30% of resistant B10.S mice to develop EAE. These results were confirmed in SJL.B mice responding to MBP but not in B6 mice responding to the same antigen, suggesting that regulation might vary among EAE resistant mouse strains. In addition, it is noted that while B6 and SJL.B mice are resistant to EAE induction with MBP, these mice are susceptible to disease induction when immunized with MOG, suggesting that EAE susceptibility verses resistance is antigen dependent. This unique mouse model, coupled with advance technologies such as peptide/IA tetramers and microarrays, should provide a powerful tool for further elucidation of the basic mechanisms of EAE resistance.