Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24794700›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2014

Imaging RNA Polymerase II transcription sites in living cells.

Martin S Buckley, John T Lis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Phase separation in gene transcription control.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Chromatin.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Liquid-liquid phase separation in human health and diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin S BuckleyDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: buckleyms@gmail.com.
John T LisDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: johnlis@cornell.edu.

Funding

COORDINATE GENE REGULATION IN ANIMAL CELLSR01GM025232 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI LIS, JOHN T · 1985 to 2020
$8.4M
COORDINATE GENE REGULATION IN ANIMAL CELLSR37GM025232 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI LIS, JOHN THOMAS · 1995 to 2004
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM25232NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM025232NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM025232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past twenty years, exciting developments in optical and molecular imaging approaches have allowed researchers to examine with unprecedented resolution the spatial organization of transcription sites in the nucleus. An attractive model that has developed from these studies is that active genes cluster to preformed transcription factories that contain multiple active RNA polymerases and transcription factor proteins required for efficient mRNA biogenesis. However, this model has been extensively debated in part due to the fact transcription factories and their features have only been documented in fixed cells. In this review, we will focus on recent live-cell imaging studies that are changing our understanding of transcription factories.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAnimalsCell SurvivalHumansNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA Polymerase IITranscription FactorsRNARNA Polymerase IITranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24794700
PMCPMC5497218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.