Trial reportJAMA2014
Safety and immunogenicity of tetanus diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization during pregnancy in mothers and infants: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00707148 (Safety and Immunogenicity of Tdap Vaccine in Healthy Pregnant Women, Safety in Their Neonates, and Effect of Maternal Immunization on Infant Immune Responses to DTaP Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 196 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Immunogenicity of Tdap Vaccine in Healthy Pregnant Women, Safety in Their Neonates, and Effect of Maternal Immunization on Infant Immune Responses to DTaP Vaccine
Who cites it
196 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 486 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two decades of global research on tetanus vaccines and tetanus immunoglobulins: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and integrative review (2000-2025).Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Expert consensus on vaccination as a primary prevention strategy for women of reproductive age, pregnant, or adulthoodRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2025Guideline
- The association between vaccine hesitancy and pertussis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant and lactating women: a systematic review.Expert review of vaccines · 2021Pooled it
- Strategies to increase uptake of maternal pertussis vaccination.Expert review of vaccines · 2021Pooled it
- The Effect of Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular-Pertussis Immunization During Pregnancy on Infant Antibody Responses: Individual-Participant Data Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- Safety and effectiveness of acellular pertussis vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2018Guideline
- Guideline
- Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of pertussis vaccination for pregnant women - a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Pooled it
- The Influence of Maternally Derived Antibody and Infant Age at Vaccination on Infant Vaccine Responses : An Individual Participant Meta-analysis.JAMA pediatrics · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review of ethical issues in vaccine studies involving pregnant women.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Pooled it
- A systematic review of adverse events following immunization during pregnancy and the newborn period.Vaccine · 2015Pooled it
- Wheeze as an adverse event in pediatric vaccine and drug randomized controlled trials: A systematic review.Vaccine · 2015Pooled it
- Vaccines for women for preventing neonatal tetanus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- A phase IV, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing two pertussis-containing vaccines in pregnant women in England and vaccine responses in their infants.BMC medicine · 2021Trial
136 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceMaternal immunization with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine could prevent infant pertussis.
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Tdap immunization during pregnancy and its effect on infant responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsPhase 1-2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial conducted from 2008 to 2012. Forty-eight pregnant women aged 18 to 45 years received Tdap (n = 33) or placebo (n = 15) at 30 to 32 weeks' gestation, with crossover immunization postpartum.
interventionsTdap vaccination at 30 to 32 weeks' gestation or postpartum. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were maternal and infant adverse events, pertussis illness, and infant growth and development until age 13 months. Secondary outcomes were antibody concentrations in pregnant women before and 4 weeks after Tdap immunization or placebo, at delivery and 2 months' postpartum, and in infants at birth, at 2 months, and after the third and fourth doses of DTaP.
resultsNo Tdap-associated serious adverse events occurred in women or infants. Injection site reactions after Tdap immunization were reported in 26 (78.8% [95% CI, 61.1%-91.0%]) and 12 (80% [95% CI, 51.9%-95.7%]) pregnant and postpartum women, respectively (P > .99). Systemic symptoms were reported in 12 (36.4% [ 95% CI, 20.4%-54.9%]) and 11 (73.3% [95% CI, 44.9%-92.2%]) pregnant and postpartum women, respectively (P = .03). Growth and development were similar in both infant groups. No cases of pertussis occurred. Significantly higher concentrations of pertussis antibodies were measured at delivery in women who received Tdap during pregnancy vs postpartum (eg, pertussis toxin antibodies: 51.0 EU/mL [95% CI, 37.1-70.1] and 9.1 EU/mL [95% CI, 4.6-17.8], respectively; P < .001) and in their infants at birth (68.8 EU/mL [95% CI, 52.1-90.8] and 14.0 EU/mL [95% CI, 7.3-26.9], respectively; P < .001) and at age 2 months (20.6 EU/mL [95% CI, 14.4-29.6] and 5.3 EU/mL [95% CI, 3.0-9.4], respectively; P < .001). Antibody responses in infants born to women receiving Tdap during pregnancy were not different following the fourth dose of DTaP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This preliminary assessment did not find an increased risk of adverse events among women who received Tdap vaccine during pregnancy or their infants. For secondary outcomes, maternal immunization with Tdap resulted in high concentrations of pertussis antibodies in infants during the first 2 months of life and did not substantially alter infant responses to DTaP. Further research is needed to provide definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of Tdap immunization during pregnancy.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00707148.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.