Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24794322›Full record

ArticleResearch in developmental disabilities2014

Toward a deeper characterization of the social phenotype of Williams syndrome: The association between personality and social drive.

Rowena Ng, Anna Järvinen, Ursula Bellugi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in developmental disabilities, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RASopathies are associated with a distinct personality profile.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Vitamin D and autism, what's new?Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rowena NgLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037-1002, USA; University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Institute of Child Development, 51 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Anna JärvinenLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037-1002, USA. Electronic address: pasley@salk.edu.
Ursula BellugiLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037-1002, USA.

Funding

Williams Syndrome: The Molecular Genetic CharacterizationP01HD033113 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BELLUGI, URSULA · 1996 to 2015
$19.4M
VARIANTS OF FOCAL BRAIN INJURYP50NS022343 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TRAUNER, DORIS A · 1985 to 2012
$15.1M
Interdisciplinary Training Program in Cognitive ScienceT32HD007151 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KERSTEN, DANIEL J · 1985 to 2013
$4.4M
NICHD NIH HHS 5T32HD007151NICHD NIH HHS HD033113NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD033113NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007151NINDS NIH HHS NS22343NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS022343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has robustly established a Williams syndrome (WS) specific personality profile, predominantly characterized a gregarious, people-oriented, and tense predisposition. Extending this work, the aims of the current, cross-sectional study were two-fold: (1) to elucidate the stability of personality characteristics in individuals with WS and typically developing (TD) comparisons across development, and (2) to explore the personality attributes that may be related to the respective profiles of social functioning characterizing the two groups, which is currently poorly understood. The sample comprised of participants with WS and TD matched on chronological age. The test battery included the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) and the Salk Institute Sociability Questionnaire (SISQ), an index of real-life social behavior. The main results showed that compared to the TD individuals, the WS group were consistently rated higher in Social Closeness, and this trait remained stable across development. Interpersonal behaviors were best predicted by Social Closeness in WS and by Social Potency in TD. Regression analysis highlighted that while a central motive underlying the increased drive toward social interaction in individuals with WS pertains to a desire to form affectionate relationships, TD individuals by contrast are motivated by a desire to exert social influence over others (leadership, social-dominance) and Well-Being (positive emotional disposition). In conclusion, these findings provide novel insight into social motivational factors underpinning the WS social behavior in real life, and contribute toward a deeper characterization of the WS affiliative drive. We suggest potential areas for behavioral intervention targeting improved social adjustment in individuals with WS.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalMotivationPersonalitySocial SkillsAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAdultChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIntelligenceLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPersonalitySocial behaviorSocial functioningSocial motivationWilliams syndrome

Identifiers

PMID24794322
PMCPMC4053572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.