Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24794084›Full record

ReviewSeminars in oncology nursing2014

Precision medicine clinical trials: defining new treatment strategies.

Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Judith J Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in oncology nursing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Unveiling the Molecular Landscape ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Types and progress of clinical trial design for breast cancer: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Promise of Nanotechnology in Personalized Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Optimizing Precision Medicine for Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard
Judith J Smith

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo discuss the role of clinical trials in the changing landscape of cancer care resulting in individualized cancer treatment plans including a discussion of several innovative randomized studies designed to evaluate multiple targeted therapies in molecularly defined subsets of individuals. DATA SOURCES: Medical and nursing literature, research articles, and clinicaltrials.gov.

conclusionRecent advancements in cancer biomarkers and biomedical technology have begun to transform fundamentals of cancer therapeutics and clinical trials through innovative adaptive trial designs. The goal of these studies is to learn not only if a drug is safe and effective but also how it is best delivered and who will derive the most benefit. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Implementation of clinical trials in the cancer biomarker era requires knowledge, skills, and expertise related to the use of biomarkers and molecularly defined processes underlying a malignancy, as well as an understanding of associated ethical, legal, and social issues to provide competent, safe, and effective health care and patient communication.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsOncology NursingPatient-Centered CarePrecision MedicineTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agentsadaptive designbiomarkerclinical trialmolecular targetsPrecision medicineresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID24794084
PMCPMC4280791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.