ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2014
Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women.
Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetologia · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among American Indians and Alaska Natives.Preventing chronic disease · 2020Trial
- Colorectal cancer screening participation in First Nations populations worldwide: a systematic review and data synthesis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer disease profile and treatment patterns at an urban tertiary hospital in Rwanda.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- Predictors of screening for cervical and colorectal cancer in women 50-65 years old in a multi-ethnic population.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Modality Among Newly Age-Eligible Medicaid Enrollees.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2018.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2020Article
- Initiation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Enrollees.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020Article
- Time to fecal immunochemical test completion for colorectal cancer screening.The American journal of managed care · 2019Article
- Characterizing Microsatellite Instability and Chromosome Instability in Interval Colorectal Cancers.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Initiation After Age 50 Years in an Organized Program.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Multilevel predictors of colorectal cancer testing modality among publicly and privately insured people turning 50.Preventive medicine reports · 2017Article
- Prevalence of colonoscopy before age 50.Preventive medicine · 2015Article
- No Quick Fixes: Integrating Population Health Education and Quality Improvement in a Large Residency Program.Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare QualityArticle
- A Practice Facilitation and Academic Detailing Intervention Can Improve Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care Safety Net Clinics.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe describe patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in a U.S. insured population as individuals become newly eligible for screening at age 50 and assess temporal trends and patient characteristics with screening uptake.
methodsWe identified a cohort of 81,223 men and women who were members of Group Health and turned 50 years old from 1996 to 2010. We ascertained receipt of colorectal cancer screening within five years. Time to screening was estimated by year of cohort entry using cumulative incidence curves and Cox proportional hazards models-estimated patient characteristics associated with screening uptake.
resultsStool-based screening tests were the most common, 72% of first screening tests. The proportion of individuals initiating colorectal cancer screening via colonoscopy increased from 8% in 1996 to 1998 to 33% in 2008 to 2010. Patient factors associated with increased colorectal cancer screening were: turning 50 more recently (2008-2010; Ptrend < 0.0001) or Asian race [HR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-1.19]. Patient factors associated with decreased screening were: being a woman (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.68-0.72), Native American (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.78), or Pacific Islander race (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95), and having prevalent diabetes (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75-0.82) and higher body mass index (Ptrend < 0.0001).
conclusionsPatient characteristics associated with initiation of colorectal cancer screening in a newly eligible population are similar to characteristics associated with overall screening participation in all age-eligible adults. Our results identify patient populations to target in outreach programs. IMPACT: Disparities in receipt of colorectal cancer screening are evident from onset of an age-eligible cohort, identifying key groups for future interventions for screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.