Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24793956›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2014

Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women.

Karen J Wernli, Rebecca A Hubbard, Eric Johnson, Jessica Chubak, Aruna Kamineni, Beverly B Green, Carolyn M Rutter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2018.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2020
    Article
  8. Initiation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Enrollees.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence of colonoscopy before age 50.Preventive medicine · 2015
    Article
  14. No Quick Fixes: Integrating Population Health Education and Quality Improvement in a Large Residency Program.Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen J WernliAuthors' Affiliation: Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington wernli.k@ghc.org.
Rebecca A HubbardAuthors' Affiliation: Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Eric JohnsonAuthors' Affiliation: Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Jessica ChubakAuthors' Affiliation: Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Aruna KamineniAuthors' Affiliation: Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Beverly B GreenAuthors' Affiliation: Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Carolyn M RutterAuthors' Affiliation: Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · US

Funding

Studying Colorectal Cancer Effectiveness of Screening Strategies (SuCCESS)U54CA163261 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHUBAK, JESSICA · 2011 to 2017
$7.3M
UW Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness Training ProgramK12HS019482 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SULLIVAN, SEAN D · 2010 to 2010
$1.6M
SURVEILLANCE EPIDEMIOLOGY &END RESULTS PROGRAMN01CN067009 · CN · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMAS, DAVID B · 1996 to 1997
–
AHRQ HHS K12 HS019482NCI NIH HHS N01 CN067009NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035142NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe describe patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in a U.S. insured population as individuals become newly eligible for screening at age 50 and assess temporal trends and patient characteristics with screening uptake.

methodsWe identified a cohort of 81,223 men and women who were members of Group Health and turned 50 years old from 1996 to 2010. We ascertained receipt of colorectal cancer screening within five years. Time to screening was estimated by year of cohort entry using cumulative incidence curves and Cox proportional hazards models-estimated patient characteristics associated with screening uptake.

resultsStool-based screening tests were the most common, 72% of first screening tests. The proportion of individuals initiating colorectal cancer screening via colonoscopy increased from 8% in 1996 to 1998 to 33% in 2008 to 2010. Patient factors associated with increased colorectal cancer screening were: turning 50 more recently (2008-2010; Ptrend < 0.0001) or Asian race [HR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-1.19]. Patient factors associated with decreased screening were: being a woman (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.68-0.72), Native American (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.78), or Pacific Islander race (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95), and having prevalent diabetes (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75-0.82) and higher body mass index (Ptrend < 0.0001).

conclusionsPatient characteristics associated with initiation of colorectal cancer screening in a newly eligible population are similar to characteristics associated with overall screening participation in all age-eligible adults. Our results identify patient populations to target in outreach programs. IMPACT: Disparities in receipt of colorectal cancer screening are evident from onset of an age-eligible cohort, identifying key groups for future interventions for screening.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24793956
PMCPMC4082473
OpenAlexW2136800733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.