ArticleJournal of biological physics2014
Comment on "Modulating DNA configuration by interfacial traction: an elastic rod model to characterize DNA folding and unfolding".
Article in Journal of biological physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this comment, we point out that the tractions induced by interfacial energy, which are referred to as the tractions on the central axis curve of the DNA elastic rod presented by Huang (J. Biol. Phys. 37(1), 79-90, 2011), are incorrect. The correct tractions are provided in this literature. Further, with the use of the correct tractions, we present new numerical results, which for the values given by Zaixing Huang do not give rise to the physical behavior observed for DNA by the author.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.