Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24793291›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Sex-biased gene expression and evolution of the x chromosome in nematodes.

Sarah Elizabeth Albritton, Anna-Lena Kranz, Prashant Rao, Maxwell Kramer, Christoph Dieterich, Sevinç Ercan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. T2T genomes ofGenome research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cohesin organizes 3D DNA contacts surrounding active enhancers inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah Elizabeth AlbrittonDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Anna-Lena KranzDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Prashant RaoDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Maxwell KramerDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Christoph DieterichMax Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, D-50931 Cologne, Germany.
Sevinç ErcanDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003 se71@nyu.edu.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS.T32HD007520 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI TREISMAN, JESSICA E · 1999 to 2023
$3.9M
Mechanisms of X chromosome dosage compensation in C. elegansR01GM107293 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ERCAN, SEVINC · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007520NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107293NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of X chromosome evolution in various organisms have indicated that sex-biased genes are nonrandomly distributed between the X and autosomes. Here, to extend these studies to nematodes, we annotated and analyzed X chromosome gene content in four Caenorhabditis species and in Pristionchus pacificus. Our gene expression analyses comparing young adult male and female mRNA-seq data indicate that, in general, nematode X chromosomes are enriched for genes with high female-biased expression and depleted of genes with high male-biased expression. Genes with low sex-biased expression do not show the same trend of X chromosome enrichment and depletion. Combined with the observation that highly sex-biased genes are primarily expressed in the gonad, differential distribution of sex-biased genes reflects differences in evolutionary pressures linked to tissue-specific regulation of X chromosome transcription. Our data also indicate that X dosage imbalance between males (XO) and females (XX) is influential in shaping both expression and gene content of the X chromosome. Predicted upregulation of the single male X to match autosomal transcription (Ohno's hypothesis) is supported by our observation that overall transcript levels from the X and autosomes are similar for highly expressed genes. However, comparison of differentially located one-to-one orthologs between C. elegans and P. pacificus indicates lower expression of X-linked orthologs, arguing against X upregulation. These contradicting observations may be reconciled if X upregulation is not a global mechanism but instead acts locally on a subset of tissues and X-linked genes that are dosage sensitive.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationSexismAnimalsCaenorhabditisEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene DosageGenes, HelminthGenes, X-LinkedGonadsHaploinsufficiencyHermaphroditic OrganismsMaleNematodaOrgan SpecificityPhylogenydosage compensationgenomicsnematodesex-biased gene expressionX chromosome evolution

Identifiers

PMID24793291
PMCPMC4096367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.