ArticleBMJ open2014
Age, occupational class and sickness absence during pregnancy: a retrospective analysis study of the Norwegian population registry.
Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of interventions targeting sickness absence among pregnant women in healthcare settings and workplaces.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Absence during pregnancy in the Danish workforce: occupational, industrial, and temporal trends in a nationwide register-based cohort study.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2025Article
- A narrative review on factors associated with job interruption during pregnancy.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2023Review
- Women's Health and Working Life: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Observational
- Sickness absence and disability pension in relation to first childbirth and in nulliparous women according to occupational groups: a cohort study of 492,504 women in Sweden.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Do birthrates contribute to sickness absence differences in women? A cohort study in Catalonia, Spain, 2012-2014.PloS one · 2020Article
- Sickness absence in pregnancy and sedentary behavior: a population-based cohort study from Norway.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Exposure to occupational hazards for pregnancy and sick leave in pregnant workers: a cross-sectional study.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2017Article
- The Relationship between Maternal Employment Status and Pregnancy Outcomes.Global journal of health science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWestern women increasingly delay having children to advance their career, and pregnancy is considered to be riskier among older women. In Norway, this development surprisingly coincides with increased sickness absence among young pregnant women, rather than their older counterparts. This paper tests the hypothesis that young pregnant women have a higher number of sick days because this age group includes a higher proportion of working class women, who are more prone to sickness absence.
designA zero-inflated Poisson regression was conducted on the Norwegian population registry.
participantsAll pregnant employees giving birth in 2004-2008 were included in the study. A total number of 216 541 pregnancies were observed among 180 483 women. OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of sick days.
resultsAlthough the association between age and number of sick days was U-shaped, pregnant women in their early 20s had a higher number of sick days than those in their mid-40s. This was particularly the case for pregnant women with previous births. In this group, 20-year-olds had 12.6 more sick days than 45-year-olds; this age difference was reduced to 6.3 after control for class. Among women undergoing their first pregnancy, 20-year-olds initially had 1.2 more sick days than 45-year-olds, but control for class altered this age difference. After control for class, 45-year-old first-time pregnant women had 2.9 more sick days than 20-year-olds with corresponding characteristics.
conclusionsThe negative association between age and sickness absence was partly due to younger age groups including more working class women, who were more prone to sickness absence. Young pregnant women's needs for job adjustments should not be underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.