Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24793171›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2014

Human airway smooth muscle maintain in situ cell orientation and phenotype when cultured on aligned electrospun scaffolds.

G E Morris, J C Bridge, O M I Eltboli, M P Lewis, A J Knox, J W Aylott, C E Brightling, A M Ghaemmaghami, F R A J Rose

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in Engineering Human Tissue Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nanofibrous Scaffolds Support a 3DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Coming to terms with tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in the lung.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G E MorrisDivision of Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom;
J C BridgeDivision of Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom;
O M I EltboliNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom;
M P Lewis
A J KnoxDivision of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom;
J W AylottLaboratory of Biophysics and Surface Analysis, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; and.
C E BrightlingNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom;
A M GhaemmaghamiDivision of Immunology, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
F R A J RoseDivision of Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; felicity.rose@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GBLoughborough University · GBNIHR Leicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H011293/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research G1001804/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human airway smooth muscle (HASM) contraction plays a central role in regulating airway resistance in both healthy and asthmatic bronchioles. In vitro studies that investigate the intricate mechanisms that regulate this contractile process are predominantly conducted on tissue culture plastic, a rigid, 2D geometry, unlike the 3D microenvironment smooth muscle cells are exposed to in situ. It is increasingly apparent that cellular characteristics and responses are altered between cells cultured on 2D substrates compared with 3D topographies. Electrospinning is an attractive method to produce 3D topographies for cell culturing as the fibers produced have dimensions within the nanometer range, similar to cells' natural environment. We have developed an electrospun scaffold using the nondegradable, nontoxic, polymer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) composed of uniaxially orientated nanofibers and have evaluated this topography's effect on HASM cell adhesion, alignment, and morphology. The fibers orientation provided contact guidance enabling the formation of fully aligned sheets of smooth muscle. Moreover, smooth muscle cells cultured on the scaffold present an elongated cell phenotype with altered contractile protein levels and distribution. HASM cells cultured on this scaffold responded to the bronchoconstrictor bradykinin. The platform presented provides a novel in vitro model that promotes airway smooth muscle cell development toward a more in vivo-like phenotype while providing topological cues to ensure full cell alignment.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCellular MicroenvironmentHumansLungModels, BiologicalMuscle, SmoothMyocytes, Smooth MuscleNanofibersPolyethylene TerephthalatesTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsPolyethylene Terephthalatesairway smooth musclealigned fiberselectrospinningin vitro modeltissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID24793171
PMCPMC4080283
OpenAlexW2333805038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.