Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24793093›Full record

Trial reportPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2014

The reinforcing and subjective effects of intravenous and intranasal buprenorphine in heroin users.

Jermaine D Jones, Gabriela Madera, Sandra D Comer

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. New Approaches in Drug Dependence: Opioids.Current addiction reports · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Clinical models of decision making in addiction.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jermaine D JonesDivision on Substance Abuse, New York Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: JermaineDJones@gmail.com.
Gabriela MaderaDivision on Substance Abuse, New York Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Sandra D ComerDivision on Substance Abuse, New York Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Prescription Opioid Effects in Drug and Non-drug AbusersR01DA016759 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI COMER, SANDRA D · 2003 to 2014
$5.0M
Contribution of Various Genetic Polymorphisms to Oxycodone's Abuse LiabilityK01DA030446 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI JONES, JERMAINE D · 2011 to 2015
$907k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA030446NIDA NIH HHS K01DA030446NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016759NIDA NIH HHS R01DA016759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abuse of buprenorphine (BUP) by the intravenous (IV) route has been documented in several studies, and reports of intranasal (IN) abuse are increasing. However, no studies have directly compared the effects of BUP when it is administered intranasally and intravenously. The present secondary analysis used data from two separate studies to compare the reinforcing and subjective effects of IV and IN buprenorphine. One study evaluated IV buprenorphine (N=13) and the other evaluated IN buprenorphine (N=12). Participants were maintained on 2 mg sublingual (SL) BUP and tested with each intranasal or intravenous buprenorphine test dose (0 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, 8 mg, and 16 mg). During morning laboratory sessions, participants received money (US $20) and sample doses of IN or IV BUP, and then completed subjective effects questionnaires. Later that day, they completed a self-administration task to receive 10% portions of the drug and/or money they previously sampled. In general, positive subjective ratings for both IV and IN BUP were significantly greater than placebo, with IV BUP having a greater effect than IN BUP. All active BUP doses (IV and IN) maintained significantly higher progressive ratio breakpoint values than placebo, but breakpoint values for IV BUP were greater than for IN BUP. Buprenorphine is an effective maintenance treatment for opioid dependence, valued for its ability to reduce the positive subjective effects of other opioids. Nevertheless, the present data demonstrate that in participants maintained on a low dose of SL BUP, the medication itself has abuse liability when used intravenously or intranasally.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdministration, IntranasalAdultBuprenorphineFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansInjections, IntravenousMaleOpiate Substitution TreatmentPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceBuprenorphineabuse liabilitybuprenorphineIntranasalintravenousopioidself administration

Identifiers

PMID24793093
PMCPMC4094364
OpenAlexW2016298461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.