Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24792708›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias2014

Multisensory stimulation on mood, behavior, and biomedical parameters in people with dementia: is it more effective than conventional one-to-one stimulation?

Ana Maseda, Alba Sánchez, Ma Pilar Marante, Isabel González-Abraldes, Carmen de Labra, José Carlos Millán-Calenti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Snoezelen in people with intellectual disability or dementia: A systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana MasedaGerontology Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, Campus de Oza, A Coruña, Spain.
Alba SánchezGerontology Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, Campus de Oza, A Coruña, Spain.
Ma Pilar MaranteGerontology Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, Campus de Oza, A Coruña, Spain.
Isabel González-AbraldesGerontology Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, Campus de Oza, A Coruña, Spain.
Carmen de LabraGerontology Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, Campus de Oza, A Coruña, Spain.
José Carlos Millán-CalentiGerontology Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, Campus de Oza, A Coruña, Spain jcmillan@udc.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of multisensory stimulation in a multisensory stimulation environment (MSSE) such as a Snoezelen room versus one-to-one activity sessions with regard to mood, behavior, and biomedical parameters (heart rate and blood oxygen saturation). The MSSE group and activity group (one-to-one activities) of patients with dementia participated in 2 weekly individualized intervention sessions over 16 weeks, where mood and behavior before, during, and after the sessions, and biomedical parameters immediately before and after, were recorded. Immediately after the sessions, patients spoke more spontaneously, related better to others, were more attentive to their environments, more active/alert, less bored/inactive, and more relaxed/content. Both groups exhibited decreases in heart rate and increases in oxygen saturation (Spo 2) values from before to after the sessions. The MSSE sessions in a Snoezelen room were found to be as effective as activity sessions, highlighting the importance of the one-to-one interaction with the therapist.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAffectAgedAged, 80 and overComplementary TherapiesDementiaFemaleHeart RateHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleOxygenPhysical StimulationTreatment OutcomeOxygenactivitydementiaelderlymultisensory stimulationsnoezelen

Identifiers

PMID24792708
PMCPMC10852670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.