Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24792440›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology2014

Assessment and treatment relevance in elderly glioblastoma patients.

Luc Bauchet, Sonia Zouaoui, Amélie Darlix, Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur, Ernestine Ferreira, Michel Fabbro, Christine Kerr, Luc Taillandier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients: A review of the literature.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Treatment of Glioblastoma in Older Adults.Current oncology reports · 2017
    Review
  19. Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luc BauchetDepartment of Neurosurgery and INSERM U1051, Hôpital Saint Eloi - Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z.); French Brain Tumor DataBase, ICM, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z., A.D.); Department of Neuroradiology, CHU, Montpellier, France (N.M. deC.); Department of Geriatrics, CHU, Montpellier, France (E.F.); Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (A.D., M.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (C.K.); Department of Neurology, CHU, Poitiers, France (L.T.).
Sonia ZouaouiDepartment of Neurosurgery and INSERM U1051, Hôpital Saint Eloi - Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z.); French Brain Tumor DataBase, ICM, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z., A.D.); Department of Neuroradiology, CHU, Montpellier, France (N.M. deC.); Department of Geriatrics, CHU, Montpellier, France (E.F.); Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (A.D., M.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (C.K.); Department of Neurology, CHU, Poitiers, France (L.T.).
Amélie DarlixDepartment of Neurosurgery and INSERM U1051, Hôpital Saint Eloi - Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z.); French Brain Tumor DataBase, ICM, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z., A.D.); Department of Neuroradiology, CHU, Montpellier, France (N.M. deC.); Department of Geriatrics, CHU, Montpellier, France (E.F.); Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (A.D., M.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (C.K.); Department of Neurology, CHU, Poitiers, France (L.T.).
Nicolas Menjot de ChampfleurDepartment of Neurosurgery and INSERM U1051, Hôpital Saint Eloi - Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z.); French Brain Tumor DataBase, ICM, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z., A.D.); Department of Neuroradiology, CHU, Montpellier, France (N.M. deC.); Department of Geriatrics, CHU, Montpellier, France (E.F.); Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (A.D., M.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (C.K.); Department of Neurology, CHU, Poitiers, France (L.T.).
Ernestine FerreiraDepartment of Neurosurgery and INSERM U1051, Hôpital Saint Eloi - Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z.); French Brain Tumor DataBase, ICM, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z., A.D.); Department of Neuroradiology, CHU, Montpellier, France (N.M. deC.); Department of Geriatrics, CHU, Montpellier, France (E.F.); Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (A.D., M.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (C.K.); Department of Neurology, CHU, Poitiers, France (L.T.).
Michel FabbroDepartment of Neurosurgery and INSERM U1051, Hôpital Saint Eloi - Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z.); French Brain Tumor DataBase, ICM, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z., A.D.); Department of Neuroradiology, CHU, Montpellier, France (N.M. deC.); Department of Geriatrics, CHU, Montpellier, France (E.F.); Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (A.D., M.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (C.K.); Department of Neurology, CHU, Poitiers, France (L.T.).
Christine KerrDepartment of Neurosurgery and INSERM U1051, Hôpital Saint Eloi - Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z.); French Brain Tumor DataBase, ICM, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z., A.D.); Department of Neuroradiology, CHU, Montpellier, France (N.M. deC.); Department of Geriatrics, CHU, Montpellier, France (E.F.); Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (A.D., M.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (C.K.); Department of Neurology, CHU, Poitiers, France (L.T.).
Luc TaillandierDepartment of Neurosurgery and INSERM U1051, Hôpital Saint Eloi - Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z.); French Brain Tumor DataBase, ICM, Montpellier, France (L.B., S.Z., A.D.); Department of Neuroradiology, CHU, Montpellier, France (N.M. deC.); Department of Geriatrics, CHU, Montpellier, France (E.F.); Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (A.D., M.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM, Montpellier, France (C.K.); Department of Neurology, CHU, Poitiers, France (L.T.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Its incidence continues to increase in the elderly because the older segment of the population is growing faster than any other age group. Most clinical studies exclude elderly patients, and "standards of care" do not exist for GBM patients aged >70 years. We review epidemiology, tumor biology/molecular factors, prognostic factors (clinical, imaging data, therapeutics), and their assessments as well as classic and specific endpoints plus recent and ongoing clinical trials for elderly GBM patients. This work includes perspectives and personal opinions on this topic. Although there are no standards of care for elderly GBM patients, we can hypothesize that (i) Karnofsky performance status (KPS), probably after steroid treatment, is one of the most important clinical factors for determining our oncological strategy; (ii) resection is superior to biopsy, at least in selected patients (depending on location of the tumor and associated comorbidities); (iii) specific schedules of radiotherapy yield a modest but significant improvement; (iv) temozolomide has an acceptable tolerance, even when KPS <70, and could be proposed for methylated elderly GBM patients; and (v) the addition of concomitant temozolomide to radiotherapy has not yet been validated but shows promising results in some studies, yet the optimal schedule of radiotherapy remains to be determined. In the future, specific assessments (geriatric, imaging, biology) and use of new endpoints (quality of life and toxicity measures) will aid clinicians in determining the balance of potential benefits and risks of each oncological strategy.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedCombined Modality TherapyGlioblastomaHumansPrognosisassessmentdatabaseelderlyglioblastomaneuro-oncology

Identifiers

PMID24792440
PMCPMC4201066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.