ArticleMaternal and child health journal2015
Cesarean birth in the border region: a descriptive analysis based on US Hispanic and Mexican birth certificates.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Birth Outcomes in the Hispanic Population in the United States: Trends, Variation, and Determinants (2011-2021).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Characteristics Associated with Sudden Unexpected Infant Death in a Rural Hispanic Population: A Case-Control Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Acculturation, Acculturative Stress, Experience of Discrimination, and Cesarean Birth in Mexican American Women.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2023Article
- Multi-level Drivers of Disparities in Hispanic Cesarean Delivery Rates in US-Mexico Border States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2020Article
- Trends in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white cesarean delivery rates on the US-Mexico border, 2000-2015.PloS one · 2018Article
- Mortality, Ethnicity, and Urbanization Among Children Aged 1-4 Years on the US-Mexico Border.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
- Prevalence of Asthma in School Children on the Arizona-Sonora Border.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean birth (CB) is more prevalent in the US-Mexico border region than among all US Hispanics. Comparable data from US and Mexican birth certificates can be used to compare prevalence and identify risk factors on either side of the border. Using 2009 US and Mexican birth certificates, we compared the characteristics of US Hispanic and Mexican CBs in six geographic subgroups: US and Mexican border counties/municipios, US and Mexican non-border counties/municipios and the US and Mexico overall. We also explored cesarean prevalence over time. During 2000-2009, CB rates increased from 22.1 to 31.6 % among US Hispanics and from 25.9 to 37.9 % among Hispanics in the US border region. 2009 rates were 44.5 % in Mexico and 43.1 % in the Mexican border region. In both countries, CB rates were similar for primiparas and multiparas. Higher education, being married and parity >4 were associated with CB in Mexico; being married was associated in the US. Hispanic rates were higher in the US border than non-border region for all age groups. Along the border, cesarean rates for Hispanics were highest in Texas (43.5 %) and neighboring Tamaulipas (49.8 %). Higher cesarean prevalence in Mexico than in US Hispanics, while unexplained, is consistent with high prevalence in some Latin American countries. Higher cesarean prevalence among Hispanics in the US border region than among Hispanics nationwide cannot be explained by maternal age or parity. Medical indications are also unlikely to explain such high rates, which are undesirable for mothers and infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.