Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24791934›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Optical stimulation of zebrafish hair cells expressing channelrhodopsin-2.

Bryan D Monesson-Olson, Jenna Browning-Kamins, Razina Aziz-Bose, Fabiana Kreines, Josef G Trapani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Water Waves to Sound Waves: Using Zebrafish to Explore Hair Cell Biology.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The genetics of hair-cell function in zebrafish.Journal of neurogenetics · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optical Stimulation of Neurons.Current molecular imaging · 2014
    Article
  14. Recording field potentials from zebrafish larvae during escape responses.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryan D Monesson-OlsonDepartment of Biology, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jenna Browning-KaminsNeuroscience Program, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Razina Aziz-BoseNeuroscience Program, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Fabiana KreinesNeuroscience Program, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Josef G TrapaniDepartment of Biology, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America; Neuroscience Program, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Amherst College · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute 52005120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate hair cells are responsible for the high fidelity encoding of mechanical stimuli into trains of action potentials (spikes) in afferent neurons. Here, we generated a transgenic zebrafish line expressing Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) under the control of the hair-cell specific myo6b promoter, in order to examine the role of the mechanoelectrical transduction (MET) channel in sensory encoding in afferent neurons. We performed in vivo recordings from afferent neurons of the zebrafish lateral line while activating hair cells with either mechanical stimuli from a waterjet or optical stimuli from flashes of ∼470-nm light. Comparison of the patterns of encoded spikes during 100-ms stimuli revealed no difference in mean first spike latency between the two modes of activation. However, there was a significant increase in the variability of first spike latency during optical stimulation as well as an increase in the mean number of spikes per stimulus. Next, we compared encoding of spikes during hair-cell stimulation at 10, 20, and 40-Hz. Consistent with the increased variability of first spike latency, we saw a significant decrease in the vector strength of phase-locked spiking during optical stimulation. These in vivo results support a physiological role for the MET channel in the high fidelity of first spike latency seen during encoding of mechanical sensory stimuli. Finally, we examined whether remote activation of hair cells via ChR2 activation was sufficient to elicit escape responses in free-swimming larvae. In transgenic larvae, 100-ms flashes of ∼470-nm light resulted in escape responses that occurred concomitantly with field recordings indicating Mauthner cell activity. Altogether, the myo6b:ChR2 transgenic line provides a platform to investigate hair-cell function and sensory encoding, hair-cell sensory input to the Mauthner cell, and the ability to remotely evoke behavior in free-swimming zebrafish.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularPhotic StimulationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell LineChannelrhodopsinsElectrophysiologyEscape ReactionGene Expression RegulationHair Cells, AuditoryLightPromoter Regions, GeneticTransgenesZebrafishChannelrhodopsins

Identifiers

PMID24791934
PMCPMC4008597
OpenAlexW2040043680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.