Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24791786›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2014

Validation of pulse rate variability as a surrogate for heart rate variability in chronically instrumented rabbits.

Peter R Pellegrino, Alicia M Schiller, Irving H Zucker

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Renal nerves dynamically regulate renal blood flow in conscious, healthy rabbits.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter R PellegrinoDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, The University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Alicia M SchillerDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, The University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Irving H ZuckerDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, The University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska izucker@unmc.edu.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of Excitatory Input into the PVN on Increased Sympathetic Drive in HeartP01HL062222 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHULTZ, HAROLD D · 1999 to 2019
$32.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL062222NHLBI NIH HHS P01-HL-62222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a function of cardiac autonomic tone that is widely used in both clinical and animal studies. In preclinical studies, HRV measures are frequently derived using the arterial pulse waveform from an implanted pressure telemetry device, termed pulse rate variability (PRV), instead of the electrocardiogram signal in accordance with clinical guidelines. The acceptability of PRV as a surrogate for HRV in instrumented animals is unknown. Using rabbits implanted with intracardiac leads and chronically implanted pressure transducers, we investigated the correlation and agreement of time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear indexes of HRV and PRV at baseline. We also investigated the effects of ventricular pacing and autonomic blockade on both measures. At baseline, HRV and PRV time- and frequency-domain parameters showed robust correlations and moderate to high agreement, whereas nonlinear parameters showed slightly weaker correlations and varied agreement. Ventricular pacing almost completely eliminated HRV, and spectral analysis of the PRV signal revealed a HRV-independent rhythm. After cardiac autonomic blockade with atropine or metoprolol, the changes in time- and non-normalized frequency-domain measures of PRV continued to show strong correlations and moderate to high agreement with corresponding changes in HRV measures. Blockade-induced changes in nonlinear PRV indexes correlated poorly with HRV changes and showed weak agreement. These results suggest that time- and frequency-domain measures of PRV are acceptable surrogates for HRV even in the context of changing cardiac autonomic tone, but caution should be used when nonlinear measures are a primary end point or when HRV is very low as HRV-independent rhythms may predominate.

Indexed as

AnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyHeart RateMalePulse Wave AnalysisRabbitsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityheart rate variabilitypulse intervalpulse rate variabilitysympathovagal balance

Identifiers

PMID24791786
PMCPMC4080177
OpenAlexW2161819982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.