Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24791735›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2014

Are current cost-effectiveness thresholds for low- and middle-income countries useful? Examples from the world of vaccines.

A T Newall, M Jit, R Hutubessy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05996549 (Acceptability, Cost-Effectiveness, and Capacity of a Facility-Based Seasonal Influenza Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05996549 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Acceptability, Cost-Effectiveness, and Capacity of a Facility-Based Seasonal Influenza Vaccination: A Study in Selected Hospitals of Bangladesh

TypeinterventionalSponsorInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshRan2022 to 2024Enrolled2,567ConditionsInfluenza Vaccine, Cost-Effectiveness, VaccinationArmsQuadrivalent Influenza Vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A T NewallFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia, a.newall@unsw.edu.au.
M Jit
R Hutubessy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization's CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE) thresholds for averting a disability-adjusted life-year of one to three times per capita income have been widely cited and used as a measure of cost effectiveness in evaluations of vaccination for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). These thresholds were based upon criteria set out by the WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, which reflected the potential economic returns of interventions. The CHOICE project sought to evaluate a variety of health interventions at a subregional level and classify them into broad categories to help assist decision makers, but the utility of the thresholds for within-country decision making for individual interventions (given budgetary constraints) has not been adequately explored. To examine whether the 'WHO-CHOICE thresholds' reflect funding decisions, we examined the results of two recent reviews of cost-effectiveness analyses of human papillomavirus and rotavirus vaccination in LMICs, and we assessed whether the results of these studies were reflected in funding decisions for these vaccination programmes. We found that in many cases, programmes that were deemed cost effective were not subsequently implemented in the country. We consider the implications of this finding, the advantages and disadvantages of alternative methods to estimate thresholds, and how cost perspectives and the funders of healthcare may impact on these choices.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesHumansMass VaccinationNational Health ProgramsPapillomavirus VaccinesRotavirus VaccinesVaccinesWorld Health OrganizationPapillomavirus VaccinesRotavirus VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.