Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24790808›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2014

Increased cardiovascular risk factors in breast cancer survivors identified by routine measurements of body composition, resting heart rate and arterial blood pressure.

David H Jones, Melisa Nestore, Sara Henophy, Julia Cousin, Alain Steve Comtois

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Side Bioimpedance Analysis in Menopausal Post-Oncological Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. The p53/Adipose-Tissue/Cancer Nexus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Cardiovascular Screening and Lipid Management in Breast Cancer Survivors.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David H JonesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Quebec in Montreal, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8 Canada ; Department of Exercise Science, The Richard J. Renaud Science Complex, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6 Canada ; Integrative Health & Wellness, VM Medical Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1L5 Canada.
Melisa NestoreIntegrative Health & Wellness, VM Medical Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1L5 Canada.
Sara HenophyIntegrative Health & Wellness, VM Medical Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1L5 Canada.
Julia CousinIntegrative Health & Wellness, VM Medical Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1L5 Canada.
Alain Steve ComtoisDepartment of Kinanthropology, University of Quebec in Montreal, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8 Canada.
Université du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main objective of this prospective study was to obtain a better understanding of the body composition and vital sign measures of cancers survivors (CS) when compared to regular (R) patients.

methodsA total of 9,315 female patients were evaluated: 476 CS and 8,839 R patients. Kinesiologists worked side by side with the medical/oncology team to collect a number of base-line measurements on body composition, resting heart rate, and blood pressure as part of the standard intake evaluation during the female patients' annual checkup.

resultsCS were more likely to have a higher BMI (P = 0.001) and a larger waist circumference (P = 0.001) than R patients. CS were also shown to have higher blood pressure values: diastolic pressure of 76.9 mmHg ± 10.5 VS 75.5 mmHg ± 9.9, (P = 0.01) and systolic pressure of 129.8 mmHg ± 17.2 VS 126.7 mmHg ±17.4 (P = 0.001) compared to R patients, respectively. Regression analysis looking at the relationship between mean arterial pressure and waist circumference did not show any difference between the two groups (CS vs R).

conclusionCS who had a higher BMI, a larger waist circumference and higher blood pressure levels, are probably at greater risk for developing cardiovascular disease, diabetes, various musculoskeletal problems as well as an increased risk for various forms of cancers including reoccurrence of previously treated cancer when compared to R patients. Changes in body composition should be considered by the medical team when looking at preventative healthcare strategies for their CS patients.

Indexed as

Blood pressureBreast cancerWaist circumference

Identifiers

PMID24790808
PMCPMC4002997
OpenAlexW2136705593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.