Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24790649›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2014

Triple-negative breast cancer: bridging the gap from cancer genomics to predictive biomarkers.

S Lindsey Davis, S Gail Eckhardt, John J Tentler, Jennifer R Diamond

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Breast Cancer Heterogeneity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020
    Article
  8. Molecular determinants of drug response in TNBC cell lines.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The tandem duplicator phenotype as a distinct genomic configuration in cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Nanosolutions for a Big Challenge.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S Lindsey DavisDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
S Gail EckhardtDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
John J TentlerDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jennifer R DiamondDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mailstop 8117, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Funding

The Development of Novel Individualized Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast CancerK23CA172691 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DIAMOND, JENNIFER R. · 2013 to 2017
$859k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA172691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a challenge clinically due to a lack of response to hormonal and HER2-targeted agents coupled with an aggressive disease course. As the biology of this breast cancer subtype is better understood, it is clear that TNBC is a heterogeneous disease and one targeted therapy is unlikely to be active in all patients. Biomarkers predictive of response to treatment are thus of great importance in TNBC. This review outlines studies evaluating biomarkers predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to targeted therapies in the advanced setting. The development of validated biomarkers in conjunction with novel targeted therapies represents an opportunity to improve patient outcomes in TNBC.

Indexed as

biomarkerstargeted therapytriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID24790649
PMCPMC3987651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.