Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24790542›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia2014

Contribution of the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS) to research on blood transfusion safety in Brazil.

Paula Loureiro, Cesar de Almeida-Neto, Anna Bárbara Carneiro Proietti, Ligia Capuani, Thelma Terezinha Gonçalez, Claudia Di Lorenzo de Oliveira, Silvana Carneiro Leão, Maria Inês Lopes, Divaldo Sampaio, Giuseppina Maria Patavino and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Paula LoureiroUniversidade de Pernambuco, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Recife, PE, Brazil, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, PE, Brazil ; Fundação Hemope, Recife, PE, Brazil, Fundação Hemope, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Cesar de Almeida-NetoFundação Pró-Sangue, Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Fundação Pró-Sangue - Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Anna Bárbara Carneiro ProiettiFundação Hemominas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, Fundação Hemominas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ligia CapuaniUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thelma Terezinha GonçalezBlood System Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA, Blood System Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Claudia Di Lorenzo de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Silvana Carneiro LeãoFundação Hemope, Recife, PE, Brazil, Fundação Hemope, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Maria Inês LopesFundação Hemope, Recife, PE, Brazil, Fundação Hemope, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Divaldo SampaioUniversidade de Pernambuco, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Recife, PE, Brazil, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, PE, Brazil ; Fundação Hemope, Recife, PE, Brazil, Fundação Hemope, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Giuseppina Maria PatavinoFundação Pró-Sangue, Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Fundação Pró-Sangue - Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
João Eduardo FerreiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paula Fraiman BlatytaFundação Pró-Sangue, Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Fundação Pró-Sangue - Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Esther Duarte LopesFundação Hemorio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, Fundação Hemorio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Alfredo Mendrone-JuniorFundação Pró-Sangue, Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Fundação Pró-Sangue - Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Nanci Alves SallesFundação Pró-Sangue, Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Fundação Pró-Sangue - Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Melissa KingWestat, Rockville, Maryland, USA, Westat, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Edward MurphyUniversity of California San Francisco, California, USA, University of California San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael BuschBlood System Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA, Blood System Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Brian CusterBlood System Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA, Blood System Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ester Cerdeira SabinoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo · BRBlood Systems Research Institute · USFundação Hemopa · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRFundação Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia de Minas Gerais · BRHemorio · BRUniversidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWestat (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS) program was established in the United States in 1989 with the purpose of increasing blood transfusion safety in the context of the HIV/AIDS and human T-lymphotropic virus epidemics. REDS and its successor, REDS-II were at first conducted in the US, then expanded in 2006 to include international partnerships with Brazil and China. In 2011, a third wave of REDS renamed the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III) was launched. This seven-year research program focuses on both blood banking and transfusion medicine research in the United States of America, Brazil, China, and South Africa. The main goal of the international programs is to reduce and prevent the transmission of HIV/AIDS and other known and emerging infectious agents through transfusion, and to address research questions aimed at understanding global issues related to the availability of safe blood. This article describes the contribution of REDS-II to transfusion safety in Brazil. Articles published from 2010 to 2013 are summarized, including database analyses to characterize blood donors, deferral rates, and prevalence, incidence and residual risk of the main blood-borne infections. Specific studies were developed to understand donor motivation, the impact of the deferral questions, risk factors and molecular surveillance among HIV-positive donors, and the natural history of Chagas disease. The purpose of this review is to disseminate the acquired knowledge and briefly summarize the findings of the REDS-II studies conducted in Brazil as well as to introduce the scope of the REDS-III program that is now in progress and will continue through 2018.

Indexed as

Blood-borne infectious diseasesBlood donationTransfusion safety

Identifiers

PMID24790542
PMCPMC4005515
OpenAlexW2133698854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.