ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014
Eye-centered visual receptive fields in the ventral intraparietal area.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coordinates of Human Visual and Inertial Heading Perception.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition.Brain structure & function · 2024Review
- Distributions of Visual Receptive Fields from Retinotopic to Craniotopic Coordinates in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Frontal Eye Fields of the Macaque.Neuroscience bulletin · 2024Article
- Temporal and spatial properties of vestibular signals for perception of self-motion.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Visuo-tactile heading perception.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Flexible coding of object motion in multiple reference frames by parietal cortex neurons.Nature neuroscience · 2020Article
- Flexible egocentric and allocentric representations of heading signals in parietal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Effect of vibration during visual-inertial integration on human heading perception during eccentric gaze.PloS one · 2018Article
- Binocular Mechanisms of 3D Motion Processing.Annual review of vision science · 2017Review
- Visual Receptive Field Heterogeneity and Functional Connectivity of Adjacent Neurons in Primate Frontoparietal Association Cortices.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Effect of eye position during human visual-vestibular integration of heading perception.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Vestibular animal models: contributions to understanding physiology and disease.Journal of neurology · 2016Review
- Receptive field properties of neurons in the macaque anterior intraparietal area.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Perisaccadic Updating of Visual Representations and Attentional States: Linking Behavior and Neurophysiology.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ventral intraparietal area (VIP) processes multisensory visual, vestibular, tactile, and auditory signals in diverse reference frames. We recently reported that visual heading signals in VIP are represented in an approximately eye-centered reference frame when measured using large-field optic flow stimuli. No VIP neuron was found to have head-centered visual heading tuning, and only a small proportion of cells had reference frames that were intermediate between eye- and head-centered. In contrast, previous studies using moving bar stimuli have reported that visual receptive fields (RFs) in VIP are head-centered for a substantial proportion of neurons. To examine whether these differences in previous findings might be due to the neuronal property examined (heading tuning vs. RF measurements) or the type of visual stimulus used (full-field optic flow vs. a single moving bar), we have quantitatively mapped visual RFs of VIP neurons using a large-field, multipatch, random-dot motion stimulus. By varying eye position relative to the head, we tested whether visual RFs in VIP are represented in head- or eye-centered reference frames. We found that the vast majority of VIP neurons have eye-centered RFs with only a single neuron classified as head-centered and a small minority classified as intermediate between eye- and head-centered. Our findings suggest that the spatial reference frames of visual responses in VIP may depend on the visual stimulation conditions used to measure RFs and might also be influenced by how attention is allocated during stimulus presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.