ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014
Does the antihyperalgesic disruptor of endothelial cells, octoxynol-9, alter nociceptor function?
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms mediating nitroglycerin-induced delayed-onset hyperalgesia in the rat.Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Regulation of alternative VEGF-A mRNA splicing is a therapeutic target for analgesia.Neurobiology of disease · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The vasoactive mediator, endothelin-1, elicits a novel form of hyperalgesia, stimulation-dependent hyperalgesia. Acting on its cognate receptor on the vascular endothelial cell, endothelin-1 produces a state in which mechanical stimulation now elicits release of pronociceptive mediators from endothelium that, in turn, acts at receptors on sensory neurons. The only evidence that octoxynol-9, a surface-active agent that attenuates both endothelial cell function and stimulus-dependent hyperalgesia, does not affect nociceptors is indirect (i.e., octoxynol-9 treatment did not affect behavioral nociceptive threshold or hyperalgesia induced by agents that act directly on nociceptors). To help address the question of whether the attenuation of stimulation-dependent hyperalgesia by octoxynol-9 treatment is due to alteration of nociceptor function, we used in vivo single-fiber electrophysiological recordings. Consistent with our previous behavioral observations, we observed no significant effect of octoxynol-9 on mechanical threshold in nociceptors, their response to sustained suprathreshold mechanical stimulation, conduction velocity, and change in mechanical threshold in response to the direct-acting hyperalgesic agent, PGE2. Although octoxynol-9 did not produce a biologically meaningful change in parameters of nociceptor function, we cannot exclude the possibility of a type II error. However, our data provide preliminary evidence of no effect of octoxynol-9 on nociceptors and are consistent with the suggestion that the primary action of octoxynol-9 in our studies is due to its action on the endothelium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.