Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24790170›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014

Emergence of band-pass filtering through adaptive spiking in the owl's cochlear nucleus.

Bertrand Fontaine, Katrina M MacLeod, Susan T Lubejko, Louisa J Steinberg, Christine Köppl, Jose L Peña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tonotopic Optimization for Temporal Processing in the Cochlear Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reverse correlation analysis of auditory-nerve fiber responses to broadband noise in a bird, the barn owl.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bertrand FontaineDominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; bertrand.fontaine@med.kuleuven.be.
Katrina M MacLeodDepartment of Biology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; and.
Susan T LubejkoDepartment of Biology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; and.
Louisa J SteinbergDominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York;
Christine KöpplCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all" and Research Center Neurosensory Science and Department of Neuroscience School of Medicine and Health Science, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Jose L PeñaDominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York;

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007288 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI AKABAS, MYLES H. · 1985 to 2022
$35.6M
Coding of Auditory Space in the Avian BrainR01DC007690 · NIDCD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COL OF MED YESHIVA UNIV · PI PENA, JOSE L · 2005 to 2025
$7.5M
PRIMING THE PUMP: TRAINING PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTS IN TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRYR25MH086466 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Melissa Arbuckle, Eduardo David Leonardo · 2009 to 2026
$4.3M
Neural Mechanisms of sound intensity codingR01DC010000 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MACLEOD, KATRINA M · 2010 to 2020
$3.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-007690NIDCD NIH HHS DC-10000NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007690NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010000NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007288NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH086466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the visual, auditory, and electrosensory modalities, stimuli are defined by first- and second-order attributes. The fast time-pressure signal of a sound, a first-order attribute, is important, for instance, in sound localization and pitch perception, while its slow amplitude-modulated envelope, a second-order attribute, can be used for sound recognition. Ascending the auditory pathway from ear to midbrain, neurons increasingly show a preference for the envelope and are most sensitive to particular envelope modulation frequencies, a tuning considered important for encoding sound identity. The level at which this tuning property emerges along the pathway varies across species, and the mechanism of how this occurs is a matter of debate. In this paper, we target the transition between auditory nerve fibers and the cochlear nucleus angularis (NA). While the owl's auditory nerve fibers simultaneously encode the fast and slow attributes of a sound, one synapse further, NA neurons encode the envelope more efficiently than the auditory nerve. Using in vivo and in vitro electrophysiology and computational analysis, we show that a single-cell mechanism inducing spike threshold adaptation can explain the difference in neural filtering between the two areas. We show that spike threshold adaptation can explain the increased selectivity to modulation frequency, as input level increases in NA. These results demonstrate that a spike generation nonlinearity can modulate the tuning to second-order stimulus features, without invoking network or synaptic mechanisms.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAuditory PerceptionCochlear NucleusNeuronsSoundStrigiformesband-pass filteringcochlear nucleusenvelope encodingthreshold adaptation

Identifiers

PMID24790170
PMCPMC4064407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.