Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24790156›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2014

Vacceed: a high-throughput in silico vaccine candidate discovery pipeline for eukaryotic pathogens based on reverse vaccinology.

Stephen J Goodswen, Paul J Kennedy, John T Ellis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prediction of Bacterial Immunogenicity by Machine Learning Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Research intoPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen J GoodswenSchool of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, The ithree Institute and Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, School of Software, The Centre for Quantum Computation and Intelligent Systems, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
Paul J KennedySchool of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, The ithree Institute and Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, School of Software, The Centre for Quantum Computation and Intelligent Systems, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
John T EllisSchool of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, The ithree Institute and Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, School of Software, The Centre for Quantum Computation and Intelligent Systems, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe present Vacceed, a highly configurable and scalable framework designed to automate the process of high-throughput in silico vaccine candidate discovery for eukaryotic pathogens. Given thousands of protein sequences from the target pathogen as input, the main output is a ranked list of protein candidates determined by a set of machine learning algorithms. Vacceed has the potential to save time and money by reducing the number of false candidates allocated for laboratory validation. Vacceed, if required, can also predict protein sequences from the pathogen's genome. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Vacceed is tested on Linux and can be freely downloaded from https://github.com/sgoodswe/vacceed/releases (includes a worked example with sample data). Vacceed User Guide can be obtained from https://github.com/sgoodswe/vacceed.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationSequence Analysis, ProteinVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID24790156
PMCPMC4207429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.