Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24789747›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2014

Mapping small effect mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: impacts of experimental design and mutational properties.

Fabien Duveau, Brian P H Metzger, Jonathan D Gruber, Katya Mack, Natasha Sood, Tiffany E Brooks, Patricia J Wittkopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Contributions of mutation and selection to regulatory variation: lessons from thePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Empirical measures of mutational effects define neutral models of regulatory evolution inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. CompensatoryEvolution letters · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabien DuveauDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 fduveau@umich.edu wittkopp@umich.edu.
Brian P H MetzgerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048.
Jonathan D GruberDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048.
Katya MackDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048.
Natasha SoodDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048.
Tiffany E BrooksDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048.
Patricia J WittkoppDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 Department of Molecular, Cellular, & Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 Center for Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2218 fduveau@umich.edu wittkopp@umich.edu.

Funding

University of Michigan Training Program in Genomic ScienceT32HG000040 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sebastian Zoellner · 1995 to 2026
$16.4M
Evolution of Gene Expression in YeastR01GM108826 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WITTKOPP, PATRICIA JEAN · 2013 to 2015
$865k
Investigating compensatory mechanisms for gene expression in the yeast genomeF32GM083513 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GRUBER, JONATHAN DAVID · 2008 to 2010
$143k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000040NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM083513-0NIGMS NIH HHS 1 R01 GM108826NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM083513NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variants identified by mapping are biased toward large phenotypic effects because of methodologic challenges for detecting genetic variants with small phenotypic effects. Recently, bulk segregant analysis combined with next-generation sequencing (BSA-seq) was shown to be a powerful and cost-effective way to map small effect variants in natural populations. Here, we examine the power of BSA-seq for efficiently mapping small effect mutations isolated from a mutagenesis screen. Specifically, we determined the impact of segregant population size, intensity of phenotypic selection to collect segregants, number of mitotic generations between meiosis and sequencing, and average sequencing depth on power for mapping mutations with a range of effects on the phenotypic mean and standard deviation as well as relative fitness. We then used BSA-seq to map the mutations responsible for three ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutant phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These mutants display small quantitative variation in the mean expression of a fluorescent reporter gene (-3%, +7%, and +10%). Using a genetic background with increased meiosis rate, a reliable mating type marker, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting to efficiently score large segregating populations and isolate cells with extreme phenotypes, we successfully mapped and functionally confirmed a single point mutation responsible for the mutant phenotype in all three cases. Our simulations and experimental data show that the effects of a causative site not only on the mean phenotype, but also on its standard deviation and relative fitness should be considered when mapping genetic variants in microorganisms such as yeast that require population growth steps for BSA-seq.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingResearch DesignBacterial ProteinsGenes, ReporterGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLuminescent ProteinsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsLuminescent Proteinsyellow fluorescent protein, BacteriaBulk Segregant AnalysisFASTER MTMutagenesis screenNext Generation SequencingTDH3

Identifiers

PMID24789747
PMCPMC4455770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.