Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24789653›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2014

Estimating the prevalence of coinfection with influenza virus and the atypical bacteria Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

M J Mina, R M Burke, K P Klugman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. My approach to respiratory sepsis: pulmonary.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Respiratory viral infections are underdiagnosed in patients with suspected sepsis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M J MinaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA, michael.j.mina@gmail.com.
R M Burke
K P Klugman
Emory University · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008169 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, ROBERT E · 1987 to 2021
$20.3M
Training in Reproductive, Perinatal, Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD052460 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DREWS-BOTSCH, CAROLYN DAWSON · 2006 to 2015
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052460NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coinfections with common bacterial respiratory pathogens and influenza viruses are well-known causes of disease, often via synergistic interactions between the influenza virus, the bacteria, and the human host. However, relatively little is known about interactions between atypical bacteria and influenza viruses. A recent report by Reinton et al. explored this issue by analyzing data from 3,661 patients seeking medical assistance for the presence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis, as well as influenza A or B virus in nasal swab specimens. The report, however, did not accurately assess the epidemiologic interactions of these pathogens. We aimed to describe the interactions between these bacterial species and influenza infections. Strong and highly statistically significant antagonistic interspecies interactions were detected between C. pneumoniae and influenza virus [odds ratio (OR): 0.09; p < 0.0001) and M. pneumoniae and influenza virus infections (OR: 0.29; p = 0.003). No association was detected between B. pertussis and influenza infection (p = 0.34), contrary to the initial report, and coinfection was not detected at a higher-than-by-chance frequency within the population. Further support of these results is supplied by the analysis of two earlier investigations reporting data on influenza virus and these atypical bacteria. Our results supplement the large body of literature regarding interactions between influenza virus and typical respiratory pathogens, providing a fuller picture of the spectrum of interactions between influenza viruses and respiratory bacteria. Further, we demonstrate the importance of choosing the most appropriate reference populations for the analysis being performed and describe the pitfalls that may occur when care is not taken in this regard.

Indexed as

Bordetella pertussisChlamydophila InfectionsChlamydophila pneumoniaeCoinfectionHumansInfluenza, HumanMycoplasma pneumoniaeOrthomyxoviridaePneumonia, BacterialPneumonia, MycoplasmaPrevalenceWhooping Cough

Identifiers

PMID24789653
PMCPMC4835343
OpenAlexW1974773586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.