Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2014
Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000170 (Amblyopia Treatment Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Amblyopia Treatment Study: Occlusion Versus Pharmacologic Therapy for Moderate Amblyopia
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brazilian best practice guidelines for amblyopia diagnosis and management.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2024Guideline
- Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern.Ophthalmology · 2023Guideline
- Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Analysis of patient adherence to emerging treatment tools for improving visual functions in amblyopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of optometryPooled it
- NEIVATECH pilot study: immersive virtual reality training in older amblyopic children with non-compliance or non-response to patching.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Alternative Flicker Glass: A New Anti-Suppression Approach to the Treatment of Anisometropic Amblyopia.Ophthalmic research · 2021Trial
- A pilot randomized clinical trial of intermittent occlusion therapy liquid crystal glasses versus traditional patching for treatment of moderate unilateral amblyopia.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2016Trial
- Development and Clinical Validation of a Digital Eye-Tracking-Based Cover Test for Ocular Misalignment.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Vision screening of Greenlandic children evaluating efficacy, coverage and future directions.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Real world gains stable in children with amblyopia following digital dichoptic treatment: PUPiL registry results.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs on Efficacy of Conventional vs. Emerging Treatments for Amblyopia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effect of Individualized and Adaptive Vision Training versus 6 hours of Patching in Children with Residual Amblyopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Prospective observational study of three real-world amblyopia treatments in children: clinical outcomes and predictive factors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Observational
- Recommendations for use and coverage of digital, binocular treatments for amblyopia.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Amblyopia Treatment in High Astigmatism: Stability and Sustained Improvements.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing Previous Strategies and Presenting a Novel Smart Glasses to Enhance Adherence to Amblyopia Therapy in Children.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceInitial treatment for amblyopia of the fellow eye with patching and atropine sulfate eyedrops improves visual acuity. Long-term data on the durability of treatment benefit are needed.
objectiveTo report visual acuity at 15 years of age among patients who were younger than 7 years when enrolled in a treatment trial for moderate amblyopia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsIn a multicenter clinical trial, 419 children with amblyopia (visual acuity, 20/40 to 20/100) were randomly assigned to patching (minimum of 6 h/d) or atropine sulfate eyedrops, 1% (1 drop daily), for 6 months. Treatment after 6 months was at the discretion of the investigator. Two years after enrollment, an unselected subgroup of 188 children were enrolled into long-term follow-up.
interventionInitial treatment with patching or atropine with subsequent treatment at investigator discretion. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Visual acuity at 15 years of age with the electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study test in amblyopic and fellow eyes.
resultsMean visual acuity in the amblyopic eye measured in 147 participants at 15 years of age was 0.14 logMAR (approximately 20/25); 59.9% of amblyopic eyes had visual acuity of 20/25 or better and 33.3%, 20/20 or better. Mean interocular acuity difference (IOD) at 15 years of age was 0.21 logMAR (2.1 lines); 48.3% had an IOD of 2 or more lines and 71.4%, 1 or more lines. Treatment (other than spectacles) was prescribed for 9 participants (6.1%) aged 10 to 15 years. Mean IOD was similar at examinations at 10 and 15 years of age (2.0 and 2.1 logMAR lines, respectively; P = .39). Better visual acuity at the 15-year examination was achieved in those who were younger than 5 years at the time of entry into the randomized clinical trial (mean logMAR, 0.09) compared with those aged 5 to 6 years (mean logMAR, 0.18; P < .001). When we compared subgroups based on original treatment with atropine or patching, no significant differences were observed in visual acuity of amblyopic and fellow eyes at 15 years of age (P = .44 and P = .43, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: At 15 years of age, most children treated for moderate amblyopia when younger than 7 years have good visual acuity, although mild residual amblyopia is common. The outcome is similar regardless of initial treatment with atropine or patching. The results indicate that improvement occurring with amblyopia treatment is maintained until at least 15 years of age.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000170.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.