Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24789274›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Diagnostic value of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Zhe Huang, Fang Liu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cells · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhe HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, 110042, China, zhehuang_ln@126.com.
Fang Liu
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant cancer with increasing incidence and mortality worldwide. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) has been widely reported to play a role in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer patients. However, published data on this subject are inconclusive. There was no meta-analysis that has been previously performed to evaluate critically the diagnostic accuracy of CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. We conducted a comprehensive search to identify studies in which the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating curves (SROC) could be determined. A total of 11 studies that included 2,316 individuals who fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria were considered for analysis. The summary estimates for serum CA19-9 in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in these studies were pooled sensitivity 0.80 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.82), specificity 0.80 (95 % CI 0.77-0.82), and DOR 14.79 (95 % CI 8.55-25.59), and the area under the curve was 0.87. Our meta-analysis showed that serum CA19-9 plays important role in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveCA-19-9 AntigenHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsCA-19-9 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID24789274
OpenAlexW2071379789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.