Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24789229›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Interacting symbionts and immunity in the amphibian skin mucosome predict disease risk and probiotic effectiveness.

Douglas C Woodhams, Hannelore Brandt, Simone Baumgartner, Jos Kielgast, Eliane Küpfer, Ursina Tobler, Leyla R Davis, Benedikt R Schmidt, Christian Bel, Sandro Hodel and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gut and skin microbiota ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Mitigation of chytridiomycosis onMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Research Status and Prospect of Amphibian Symbiotic Microbiota.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Douglas C WoodhamsInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Hannelore BrandtInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Simone BaumgartnerInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jos KielgastSection for Freshwater Biology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eliane KüpferInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Evolutionary Biology, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Ursina ToblerInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; KARCH, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Leyla R DavisInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Benedikt R SchmidtInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; KARCH, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Christian BelInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sandro HodelInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rob KnightHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Valerie McKenzieDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
University of Zurich · CHHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenesis is strongly dependent on microbial context, but development of probiotic therapies has neglected the impact of ecological interactions. Dynamics among microbial communities, host immune responses, and environmental conditions may alter the effect of probiotics in human and veterinary medicine, agriculture and aquaculture, and the proposed treatment of emerging wildlife and zoonotic diseases such as those occurring on amphibians or vectored by mosquitoes. Here we use a holistic measure of amphibian mucosal defenses to test the effects of probiotic treatments and to assess disease risk under different ecological contexts. We developed a non-invasive assay for antifungal function of the skin mucosal ecosystem (mucosome function) integrating host immune factors and the microbial community as an alternative to pathogen exposure experiments. From approximately 8500 amphibians sampled across Europe, we compared field infection prevalence with mucosome function against the emerging fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Four species were tested with laboratory exposure experiments, and a highly susceptible species, Alytes obstetricans, was treated with a variety of temperature and microbial conditions to test the effects of probiotic therapies and environmental conditions on mucosome function. We found that antifungal function of the amphibian skin mucosome predicts the prevalence of infection with the fungal pathogen in natural populations, and is linked to survival in laboratory exposure experiments. When altered by probiotic therapy, the mucosome increased antifungal capacity, while previous exposure to the pathogen was suppressive. In culture, antifungal properties of probiotics depended strongly on immunological and environmental context including temperature, competition, and pathogen presence. Functional changes in microbiota with shifts in temperature provide an alternative mechanistic explanation for patterns of disease susceptibility related to climate beyond direct impact on host or pathogen. This nonlethal management tool can be used to optimize and quickly assess the relative benefits of probiotic therapies under different climatic, microbial, or host conditions.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAmphibiansAnimalsChytridiomycotaMucous MembraneProbioticsSkinSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID24789229
PMCPMC4005770
OpenAlexW2154337567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.