Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24789184›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Next-generation sequencing for typing and detection of resistance genes: performance of a new commercial method during an outbreak of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli.

J Veenemans, I T Overdevest, E Snelders, I Willemsen, Y Hendriks, A Adesokan, G Doran, S Bruso, A Rolfe, A Pettersson and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Past, Present, and Future ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamase-ProducingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Beta-Lactamase-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Comparison of MALDI-TOF MS and AFLP for strain typing of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J VeenemansLaboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands jacobien.veenemans@gmail.com.
I T OverdevestLaboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
E SneldersLaboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
I WillemsenLaboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Y HendriksLaboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
A AdesokanPathogenica, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
G DoranPathogenica, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
S BrusoPathogenica, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
A RolfePathogenica, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
A PetterssonDepartment for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J A J W KluytmansLaboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands Department for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to provide typing results and detect resistance genes in a single assay, thus guiding timely treatment decisions and allowing rapid tracking of transmission of resistant clones. We evaluated the performance of a new NGS assay (Hospital Acquired Infection BioDetection System; Pathogenica) during an outbreak of sequence type 131 (ST131) Escherichia coli infections in a nursing home in The Netherlands. The assay was performed on 56 extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) E. coli isolates collected during 2 prevalence surveys (March and May 2013). Typing results were compared to those of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), whereby we visually assessed the agreement of the BioDetection phylogenetic tree with clusters defined by AFLP. A microarray was considered the gold standard for detection of resistance genes. AFLP identified a large cluster of 31 indistinguishable isolates on adjacent departments, indicating clonal spread. The BioDetection phylogenetic tree showed that all isolates of this outbreak cluster were strongly related, while the further arrangement of the tree also largely agreed with other clusters defined by AFLP. The BioDetection assay detected ESBL genes in all but 1 isolate (sensitivity, 98%) but was unable to discriminate between ESBL and non-ESBL TEM and SHV beta-lactamases or to specify CTX-M genes by group. The performance of the hospital-acquired infection (HAI) BioDetection System for typing of E. coli isolates compared well with the results of AFLP. Its performance with larger collections from different locations, and for typing of other species, was not evaluated and needs further study.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksDrug Resistance, Bacterialbeta-LactamasesCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsGenes, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyMolecular TypingNetherlandsNursing HomesPhylogenybeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID24789184
PMCPMC4097710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.