Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24788898›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Safety, effectiveness and acceptability of the PrePex device for adult male circumcision in Kenya.

Paul J Feldblum, Elijah Odoyo-June, Walter Obiero, Robert C Bailey, Stephanie Combes, Catherine Hart, Jaim Jou Lai, Shelly Fischer, Peter Cherutich

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01711411 (Prospective Observational Study of Male Circumcision Using the PrePex Device in Routine Clinical Settings in Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01711411 completednot on this map

Prospective Observational Study of Male Circumcision Using the PrePex Device in Routine Clinical Settings in Kenya

TypeobservationalSponsorFHI 360Ran2012 to 2013Enrolled427ConditionsHIVArmsPrePex device for male circumcision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Circumcision and its effects in Africa.Translational andrology and urology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul J FeldblumClinical Sciences Unit, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Elijah Odoyo-JuneNyanza Reproductive Health Society, Kisumu, Kenya; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Walter ObieroNyanza Reproductive Health Society, Kisumu, Kenya; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Robert C BaileyUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Stephanie CombesClinical Sciences Unit, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Catherine HartClinical Sciences Unit, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jaim Jou LaiQuantitative Sciences Department, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Shelly FischerClinical Sciences Unit, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Peter CherutichNational AIDS & STI Control Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

DevelopmentalP30AI082151 · NIAID · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LANDAY, ALAN L · 2009 to 2014
$4.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of the PrePex device for adult medical male circumcision (MMC) in routine service delivery in Kenya.

methodsWe enrolled 427 men ages 18-49 at one fixed and two outreach clinics. Procedures were performed by trained clinical officers and nurses. The first 50 enrollees were scheduled for six follow-up visits, and remaining men were followed at Days 7 and 42. We recorded adverse events (AEs) and time to complete healing, and interviewed men about acceptability and pain.

resultsPlacement and removal procedures each averaged between 3 and 4 minutes. Self-reported pain was minimal during placement but was fleetingly intense during removal. The rate of moderate/severe AEs was 5.9% overall (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8%-8.5%), all of which resolved without sequelae. AEs included 5 device displacements, 2 spontaneous foreskin detachments, and 9 cases of insufficient foreskin removal. Surgical completion of MMC was required for 9 men (2.1%). Among the closely monitored first 50 participants, the probability of complete healing by Day 42 was 0.44 (95% CI 0.30-0.58), and 0.90 by Day 56. A large majority of men was favorable about their MMC procedure and would recommend PrePex to friends and family.

conclusionsThe PrePex device was effective for MMC in Kenya, and well-accepted. The AE rate was higher than reported for surgical procedures there, or in previous PrePex studies. Healing time is longer than following surgical circumcision. Provider experience and clearer counseling on post-placement and post-removal care should lead to lower AE rates.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01711411.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultCircumcision, MaleHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementSelf ReportTreatment OutcomeWound HealingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24788898
PMCPMC4006910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.