Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24788794›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Validation of a French version of the quality of life "Celiac Disease Questionnaire".

Jacques Pouchot, Carole Despujol, Georgia Malamut, Emmanuel Ecosse, Joël Coste, Christophe Cellier

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Psychological morbidity of celiac disease: A review of the literature.United European gastroenterology journal · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jacques PouchotService de médecine interne, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publiques - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; APEMAC, EA 4360, Université de Lorraine, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Carole DespujolService de médecine interne, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publiques - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Georgia MalamutService de gastroentérologie, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publiques - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Emmanuel EcosseAPEMAC, EA 4360, Université de Lorraine, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Joël CosteAPEMAC, EA 4360, Université de Lorraine, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Christophe CellierService de gastroentérologie, hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publiques - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité de Lorraine · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveCeliac disease (CD) is a common chronic autoimmune disorder. Both the manifestations of the disease and the burden of the compulsory life-long gluten-free diet (GFD) have been shown to be associated with impairment of health-related quality of life. The objectives of this study were to provide a cross-cultural adaptation of the specific quality of life "Celiac Disease Questionnaire" (CDQ) and to analyze its psychometric properties. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-cultural French adaptation of the CDQ (F-CDQ) was obtained according to the revised international guidelines. The questionnaire was administered at baseline to 211 patients with biopsy proven CD followed-up in a single tertiary referral centre. The questionnaire was also administered after 7 days and 6 months. Reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Cronbach's alpha and Bland and Altman graphical analysis), validity (factorial structure and Rasch analysis, convergent validity), and responsiveness (effect size) of the F-CDQ were studied.

resultsThe reliability of the F-CDQ was excellent with ICC and Cronbach's alpha coefficients being between 0.79 and 0.94 for the four subscales and the total score. The factorial structure and the Rasch analysis showed that the four dimensions of the original instrument were retained. Correlations with external measures (a generic measure of quality of life, an anxiety and depression instrument, a self-assessed disease severity, and clinical manifestations) were all in the expected direction confirming the validity of the instrument. Responsiveness was studied and effect sizes ≥ 0.20 were demonstrated for most of the subscales for patients who reported improvement or deterioration after 6 months.

conclusionThe F-CDQ retains the psychometric properties of the original instrument and should be useful in cross-national surveys and to assess outcome in clinical trials involving patients with CD.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCeliac DiseaseFemaleFranceHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24788794
PMCPMC4008531
OpenAlexW2160713905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.