Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24788714›Full record

ReviewJournal of aging and health2014

How design of places promotes or inhibits mobility of older adults: realist synthesis of 20 years of research.

Irene H Yen, Johnna Fandel Flood, Hannah Thompson, Lynda A Anderson, Geoff Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of aging and health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Built Environment and Health Behaviors: Deconstructing the Black Box of Interactions-A Review of Reviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Neighborhood Environment and Handgrip Strength: Longitudinal Findings From the Health and Retirement Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neighborhood Makes or Breaks Active Ageing? Findings from Cross-Sectional Path Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Moving around a Large City in Latin America: The Mobility Challenges Faced by Older Adults with Disabilities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Perspectives on Active Transportation in a Mid-Sized Age-Friendly City: "You Stay Home".International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irene H YenUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA irene.yen@ucsf.edu.
Johnna Fandel FloodUniversity of California, Berkeley, USA.
Hannah ThompsonUniversity of California, San Francisco, USA.
Lynda A AndersonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Geoff WongBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/1008/07Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the environmental features that best support aging in place.

methodWe conducted a realist synthesis, a theory-driven interpretive method of evidence synthesis, of 120+ articles (published 1991-2011) that attempts to explain how place may influence older adults' decisions about mobility (e.g., physical activity). We developed an initial program theory, reviewed the literature, identified outcomes, analyzed and synthesized patterns, and created a final program theory.

resultsSafety was a central mechanism, serving as one of the bridges between environmental components (e.g., connectivity, aesthetics, retail and services) and decisions about mobility. Population density, sidewalk presence, and park proximity did not emerge as key factors. DISCUSSION: Safety considerations are one of the most prominent influences of older adults' decisions about mobility. Street connectivity, pedestrian access and transit, and retail and services were also important. These factors are amenable to change and can help promote mobility for older adults.

Indexed as

Decision MakingActivities of Daily LivingAgedEnvironment DesignHumansMiddle AgedPsychological TheoryResidence CharacteristicsSafetyWalkingbuilt environmentmobilityneighborhoodrealist synthesis

Identifiers

PMID24788714
PMCPMC4535337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.