Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24788603›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Gene-flow in a mosaic hybrid zone: is local introgression adaptive?

Christelle Fraïsse, Camille Roux, John J Welch, Nicolas Bierne

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Introduction to Population Genomics Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Christelle FraïsseUniversité Montpellier 2, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France CNRS, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, ISEM Unité Mixte de Recherche 5554, 34200 SETE, France Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EH Cambridge, United Kingdom christelle.fraisse@univ-montp2.fr.
Camille RouxUniversité Montpellier 2, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France CNRS, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, ISEM Unité Mixte de Recherche 5554, 34200 SETE, France Department of Ecology and Evolution, Lausanne University, Biophore/Sorge, CH-1015.
John J WelchDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EH Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nicolas BierneUniversité Montpellier 2, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France CNRS, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, ISEM Unité Mixte de Recherche 5554, 34200 SETE, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide scans of genetic differentiation between hybridizing taxa can identify genome regions with unusual rates of introgression. Regions of high differentiation might represent barriers to gene flow, while regions of low differentiation might indicate adaptive introgression-the spread of selectively beneficial alleles between reproductively isolated genetic backgrounds. Here we conduct a scan for unusual patterns of differentiation in a mosaic hybrid zone between two mussel species, Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis. One outlying locus, mac-1, showed a characteristic footprint of local introgression, with abnormally high frequency of edulis-derived alleles in a patch of M. galloprovincialis enclosed within the mosaic zone, but low frequencies outside of the zone. Further analysis of DNA sequences showed that almost all of the edulis allelic diversity had introgressed into the M. galloprovincialis background in this patch. We then used a variety of approaches to test the hypothesis that there had been adaptive introgression at mac-1. Simulations and model fitting with maximum-likelihood and approximate Bayesian computation approaches suggested that adaptive introgression could generate a "soft sweep," which was qualitatively consistent with our data. Although the migration rate required was high, it was compatible with the functioning of an effective barrier to gene flow as revealed by demographic inferences. As such, adaptive introgression could explain both the reduced intraspecific differentiation around mac-1 and the high diversity of introgressed alleles, although a localized change in barrier strength may also be invoked. Together, our results emphasize the need to account for the complex history of secondary contacts in interpreting outlier loci.

Indexed as

Gene FlowHybridization, GeneticMosaicismAdaptation, PhysiologicalAlgorithmsAllelesAnimalsBase SequenceChromosomesEuropeGenetic LociGenomeGeographyInbreedingLikelihood FunctionsModels, Geneticapproximate Bayesian computationmaximum likelihoodMytilusoutlier locisoft sweep

Identifiers

PMID24788603
PMCPMC4096372
OpenAlexW2020943359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.